Cited by 353Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCryptography and Residue ArithmeticCoding theory and cryptography

Report on lightweight cryptography

Open access
McKay, Kerry A, Bassham, Larry, Turan, Meltem Sonmez, Mouha, Nicky·2017

Abstract

leadership for the Nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of management, administrative, technical, and physical standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of other than national security-related information in federal information systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.ir.8114

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NIST is currently standardizing lightweight cryptography methods for constrained devices through an open competition-like process, with the second round completed in 2020.

    “It is noteworthy that, NIST is currently standardizing the lightweight cryptography methods for constrained devices through an open competition-like process (the second round of the process completed in 2020) [107].”

    From Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [107]

    The Introduction and §3.4 describe NIST’s plans to standardize lightweight algorithms for constrained devices through an open submission and evaluation process. The 2017 report does not support the claim that a second round was completed in 2020; it describes the process as prospective. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lightweight cryptography methods included in NIST's initial report may only be seen as a reference until the standardization process is concluded.

    “Therefore, the aforementioned methods may only be seen as a reference which were included in NIST's initial report on lightweight cryptography and until the standardization process is concluded.”

    From Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [107]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [68]68. Needham, R.M., and Wheeler, D.J., Tea extensions, Technical Report, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, October 1997, http://www.cix.co.uk/~klockstone/xtea.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKay, K. A., Bassham, L., Turan, M. S., & Mouha, N.
Published
2017-03
OpenAlex
W2610964475
Cited by
353
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Funders
Information Technology Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
lightweight cryptography, cryptography, information security, privacy, federal information systems, standards development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review