The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer Security Incident Handling Guide : Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
Open accessAbstract
This publication has been developed by NIST to further its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), Public Law (P.L.) 107-347.NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for Federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate Federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems.This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, Section 8b(3), Securing Agency Information Systems, as analyzed in Circular A-130, Appendix IV: Analysis of Key Sections.Supplemental information is provided in Circular A-130, Appendix III, Security of Federal Automated Information Resources.Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on Federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority.Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other Federal official.This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When these logs serve as evidence in forensic investigations, compliance audits, or incident-response workflows, their integrity is not merely desirable; it is a hard prerequisite (Kebande and Venter, 2017; Cichonski et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012).”
From Lightweight Tamper-Evident Log Integrity Verification for IoT Edge Environments: A Merkle Tree Pipeline with Adaptive Chunking (2026) · cites this paper as Cichonski et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“The standards serve as frameworks to develop secure networks and can be used as guides and best practice definitions [84].”
From Impact, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigation Strategies for Cyber-Secure Critical Infrastructure. (2023) · cites this paper as [84]
Citations
Cites
Guide to test, training, and exercise programs for IT plans and capabilities
Grance, T., Nolan, T., Burke, K., Dudley, R., White, G., & Good, T. (2006) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-84 · Cited by 41
Self-citationRecommended security controls for federal information systems and organizations
Ross, R., Katzke, S. W., Johnson, L. A., Swanson, M., Stoneburner, G., & Rogers, G. (2007) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r2 · Cited by 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-82r2 · Cited by 1,377
Studying users' computer security behavior: A health belief perspective
Ng, B.-Y., Kankanhalli, A., & Xu, Y. C. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.010 · Cited by 588
Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations
Joint Task Force Interagency Working Group (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r5 · Cited by 419
A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems
Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., & Jones, K. (2015) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2015.02.002 · Cited by 344
Data-Driven Cybersecurity Incident Prediction: A Survey
Sun, N., Zhang, J., Rimba, P., Gao, S., Zhang, L. Y., & Xiang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2885561 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Cichonski, P., Millar, T., Grance, T., & Scarfone, K.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- United States Department of Homeland Security (US)
- ORCID
- Scarfone, Karen
- Published
- 2012-08
- OpenAlex
- W2617200927
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2025-04-03)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- incident response, information security management, FISMA, NIST guidelines, federal information systems, information security standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review