The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electronic authentication guideline
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Science of Guessing: Analyzing an Anonymized Corpus of 70 Million Passwords
Bonneau, J. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.49 · Cited by 687
Wang, D., Cheng, H., Wang, P., Huang, X., & Jian, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2017.2721359 · Cited by 499
Fast dictionary attacks on passwords using time-space tradeoff
Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2005) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1102120.1102168 · Cited by 447
A Survey on Systems Security Metrics
Pendleton, M., Garcia-Lebron, R., Cho, J.-H., & Xu, S. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3005714 · Cited by 283
PassChords: secure multi-touch authentication for blind people
Azenkot, S., Rector, K., Ladner, R., & Wobbrock, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/2384916.2384945 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Burr, W. E., Dodson, D. F., & Polk, W. T.
- Published
- 2004
- OpenAlex
- W4298423176
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic authentication guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/nist.sp.800-63v1.0.1
- The paper
- Burr, W. E., Dodson, D. F., & Polk, W. T. (2004). Electronic authentication guideline. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-63v1.0.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
