The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response
Open accessAbstract
Reports on Computer Systems TechnologyThe Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems.This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL's research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A single undetected modification can invalidate an entire chain of evidence and compromise legal admissibility (Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012; Stoyanova et al., 2020).”
From Lightweight Tamper-Evident Log Integrity Verification for IoT Edge Environments: A Merkle Tree Pipeline with Adaptive Chunking (2026) · cites this paper as Kent et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When these logs serve as evidence in forensic investigations, compliance audits, or incident-response workflows, their integrity is not merely desirable; it is a hard prerequisite (Kebande and Venter, 2017; Cichonski et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012).”
From Lightweight Tamper-Evident Log Integrity Verification for IoT Edge Environments: A Merkle Tree Pipeline with Adaptive Chunking (2026) · cites this paper as Kent et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carrier, B. D. (2005) · Cited by 568
Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials
Kruse, W. G., & Heiser, J. G. (2001) · Cited by 361
Digital Evidence and Computer Crime
Casey, E. (2000) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 298
Digital Evidence and Computer Crime
Kizza, J. M., & Kizza, F. M. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/9781599043791.ch015 · Cited by 219
The Tao Of Network Security Monitoring: Beyond Intrusion Detection
Bejtlich, R. (2004) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 133
Farmer, D., & Venema, W. (2004) · Cited by 121
Handbook of Computer Crime Investigation : Forensic Tools and Technology
Casey, E. (2001) · Cited by 95
Real Digital Forensics: Computer Security and Incident Response
Jones, K. J., Bejtlich, R., & Rose, C. W. (2005) · Cited by 82
Silence on the wire: a field guide to passive reconnaissance and indirect attacks
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0996 · Cited by 47
Incident Response: Computer Forensics Toolkit
Schweitzer, D. (2003) · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Honeynet Project. Know Your Enemy: Learning about Security Threats, Second Edition.
- Prosise, Chris, et al. Incident Response and Computer Forensics, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, 2003.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 591
Securing Smart Card Management Using Hyperledger Based Private Blockchain
Akter, N., Haque, F., Reno, S., & Ahmed, M. (2022) · International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) · doi:10.1109/incet54531.2022.9825176 · Cited by 10
Evaluating and Comparing Tools for Mobile Device Forensics Using Quantitative Analysis
Saleem, S., Popov, O., & Appiah-Kubi, O. K. (2013) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39891-9_17 · Cited by 10
Data Mining based Crime-Dependent Triage in Digital Forensics Analysis
Berté, R., Marturana, F., Me, G., & Tacconi, S. (2012) · doi:10.13140/2.1.3119.9680 · Cited by 10
Identifying Digital Forensic Frameworks Based on Processes Models
Jawad, T. M., & Abdulmajeed, A. S. (2021) · Iraqi Journal of Science · doi:10.24996/ijs.2021.si.1.35 · Cited by 10
A Digital Forensics Triage methodology based on feature manipulation techniques
McClelland, D. B. L., & Marturana, F. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops · doi:10.1109/iccw.2014.6881277 · Cited by 10
Digital forensic investigation in cloud computing environment: Impact on privacy
Sharevski, F. (2013) · doi:10.1109/sadfe.2013.6911542 · Cited by 10
Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
Ross, R., & Pillitteri, V. Y. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-171r3.ipd · Cited by 13
RetractedMohamed, H., Koroniotis, N., Moustafa, N., Schiliro, F., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2024.3492919 · Cited by 12
Modelling based approach for reconstructing evidence of VoIP malicious attacks
Ibrahim, M., & Dehghantanha, A. (2014) · University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) · Cited by 9
Chen, C.-M., Cai, Z.-X., & Wen, D.-W. (2021) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.20220301.oa5 · Cited by 9
A forensically-enabled IAAS cloud computing architecture
Alqahtany, S. S., Clarke, N., Furnell, S., & Reich, C. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.4225/75/57b3e3a5fb87e · Cited by 9
Resource-Based Event Reconstruction of Digital Crime Scenes
Liao, Y., & Langweg, H. (2014) · doi:10.1109/jisic.2014.28 · Cited by 9
Forensic model for cloud computing: An overview
Alex, M. E., & Kishore, R. (2016) · International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) · doi:10.1109/wispnet.2016.7566345 · Cited by 9
A framework for validating aimed mobile digital forensics evidences
Wilson, R., & Chi, H. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3190645.3190695 · Cited by 9
Secure Opportunistic Contextual Logging for Wearable Healthcare Sensing Devices
Siddiqi, M., Ali, S. T., & Sivaraman, V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2019.2927674 · Cited by 8
Visual Decision-Support for Live Digital Forensics
Böhm, F., Englbrecht, L., Friedl, S., & Pernul, G. (2021) · IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VIZSEC) · doi:10.1109/vizsec53666.2021.00012 · Cited by 9
Forensic Analysis Avoidance Techniques of Malware
Brand, M. (2007) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.4225/75/57ad403c7ff2a · Cited by 9
Traceability in digital forensic investigation process
Selamat, S. R., Yusof, R., Sahib, S., Hassan, N. H., Abdollah, M. F., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2011) · IEEE Conference on Open Systems · doi:10.1109/icos.2011.6079259 · Cited by 9
Mitigating anti-forensics in the Cloud via resource-based privacy preserving activity attribution
Odebade, A., Welsh, T., Mthunzi, S. N., & Benkhelifa, E. (2017) · International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS) · doi:10.1109/sds.2017.7939155 · Cited by 9
A Forensic Enabled Data Provenance Model for Public Cloud
Haque, S., & Atkison, T. (2018) · The journal of digital forensics, security and law · doi:10.15394/jdfsl.2018.1570 · Cited by 9
A proposed digital forensic investigation framework for an eGovernment structure for Uganda
Kigwana, I., Kebande, V. R., & Venter, H. S. (2017) · IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) · doi:10.23919/istafrica.2017.8102348 · Cited by 9
Ensuring the Integrity of Digital Evidence: The Role of the Chain of Custody in Digital Forensics
Narasimhan, P., & Dr.N.Kala (2024) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit2410612443 · Cited by 8
Dowody cyfrowe – teoria i praktyka kryminalistyczna w polskim postępowaniu karnym
Lewulis, P. (2021) · Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego eBooks · doi:10.31338/uw.9788323548027 · Cited by 8
Forensics for multi-stage cyber incidents: Survey and future directions
Nisioti, A., Loukas, G., Mylonas, A., & Panaousis, E. (2022) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301480 · Cited by 8
Gradually Improving the Forensic Process
Neuner, S., Mulazzani, M., Schrittwieser, S., & Weippl, E. R. (2015) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1109/ares.2015.32 · Cited by 8
Forensic Process as a Service (FPaaS) for Cloud Computing
Eleyan, A., & Eleyan, D. (2015) · European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference · doi:10.1109/eisic.2015.14 · Cited by 8
Ningsih, S., & The Society of Digital Information and Wireless Communication (2018) · International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics · doi:10.17781/p002463 · Cited by 8
Web Forensic on Container Services Using Grr Rapid Response Framework
Riadi, I., Umar, R., & Sugandi, A. (2020) · Scientific Journal of Informatics · doi:10.15294/sji.v7i1.18299 · Cited by 8
A Serious Game-Based Peer-Instruction Digital Forensics Workshop
Englbrecht, L., & Pernul, G. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59291-2_9 · Cited by 8
Proactive Network Packet Classification Using Artificial Intelligence
Abirami, A., & Palanikumar, S. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72236-4_7 · Cited by 8
Securing Cloud Native Applications Using Blockchain
Mendki, P. (2021) · International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS) · doi:10.1109/icics52457.2021.9464583 · Cited by 7
Web Browser Forensic Tools: Autopsy, BHE and Net Analysis
Adamu, H., Ahmad, A. A., Adamu, H., & Gambasha, S. B. (2021) · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science · doi:10.51584/ijrias.2021.6506 · Cited by 8
Static Forensic Pada USB Mass Storage Menggunakan Forensics Toolkit Imager
Santoso, B., & Sulaksono, P. M. (2022) · Jurnal Komputer Terapan · doi:10.35143/jkt.v8i1.5334 · Cited by 8
Javed, M. S., Sajjad, S. M., Mehmood, D., Mansoor, K., Iqbal, Z., Kazim, M. Z., & Muhammad, Z. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15080495 · Cited by 8
Internet of Things in Forensics Investigation in Comparison to Digital Forensics
Sharma, B. K., Hachem, M., Mishra, V. P., & Kaur, M. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40305-8_32 · Cited by 8
Towards an Automated Digital Data Forensic Model with specific reference to Investigation Processes
Scholtz, J., & Narayanan, A. (2010) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.4225/75/57b2b3b340ce2 · Cited by 8
Solid state drive data recovery in open source environment
Aldaej, A., Ahamad, M. G., & Uddin, M. Y. (2017) · International Conference on Anti-Cyber Crimes (ICACC) · doi:10.1109/anti-cybercrime.2017.7905296 · Cited by 8
Managing the Security of Information Exchanges
Dempsey, K. L., Pillitteri, V. Y., & Regenscheid, A. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-47r1 · Cited by 14
Shinde, S. M., & Gurrala, V. R. (2023) · Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology · doi:10.26636/jtit.2023.164522 · Cited by 9
Cybercrime Intention Recognition: A Systematic Literature Review
Kassa, Y. W., James, J. I., & Belay, E. G. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15050263 · Cited by 7
Quantifying Windows File Slack Size and Stability
Mulazzani, M., Neuner, S., Kieseberg, P., Huber, M., Schrittwieser, S., & Weippl, E. R. (2013) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41148-9_13 · Cited by 7
Cloud computing digital forensics framework for automated anomalies detection
Pătraşcu, A., Velciu, M.-A., & Patriciu, V.-V. (2015) · IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) · doi:10.1109/saci.2015.7208257 · Cited by 7
Kwasinski, A. (2011) · International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies · doi:10.1145/2093698.2093856 · Cited by 7
A Closer Look at Syncany Windows and Ubuntu Clients’ Residual Artefacts
Teing, Y., Dehghantanha, A., Choo, K. R., Muda, Z., Abdullah, M. T., & Chai, W.-C. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49145-5_34 · Cited by 7
Identifying Evidence for Cloud Forensic Analysis
Liu, C., Singhal, A., & Wijesekera, D. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5026-8_15 · Cited by 7
A Review of Internet of Things (IoT) Forensics Frameworks and Models
Al-Hussaeni, K., Brits, J., Praveen, M., Yaqoob, A., & Karamitsos, I. (2023) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_37 · Cited by 7
Cyber Forensics and Incident Response
Gurkok, C. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394397-2.00034-9 · Cited by 7
Digital Forensics Evidence Acquisition and Chain of Custody in Cloud Computing
Nasreldin, M. M., El-Hennawy, M., Aslan, H. K., & El-Hennawy, A. E. (2015) · Cited by 7
WaybackVisor: Hypervisor-Based Scalable Live Forensic Architecture for Timeline Analysis
Hirano, M., Tsuzuki, T., Ikeda, S., Taka, N., Fujiwara, K., & Kobayashi, R. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72395-2_21 · Cited by 7
Real-Time Forensics Through Endpoint Visibility
Kieseberg, P., Neuner, S., Schrittwieser, S., Schmiedecker, M., & Weippl, E. R. (2018) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73697-6_2 · Cited by 7
Automating Network Security Analysis at Packet-level by using Rule-based Engine
Holkovič, M., Ryšavý, O., & Dudek, J. (2019) · doi:10.1145/3352700.3352714 · Cited by 7
Digital Forensics and Data Mining
Suaib, M., Akbar, M., & Husain, M. S. (2020) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1558-7.ch014 · Cited by 7
Basic Forensic Procedures for Cyber Crime Investigation in Smart Grid Networks
Kotsiuba, I., Skarga-Bandurova, I., Giannakoulias, A., & Bulda, O. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata47090.2019.9006215 · Cited by 7
Digital Forensics Education Modules for Judicial Officials
Hasan, R., Yuliang Zheng, A., & Walker, J. T. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58703-1_3 · Cited by 7
Tully, S., & Mohanraj, Y. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804629-6.00002-x · Cited by 7
Architectures for Cyber-Security Incident Reporting in Safety-Critical Systems
Johnson, C. (2014) · Lecture notes in social networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08819-8_7 · Cited by 8
Taxonomy of Digital Forensics: Investigation Tools and ChallengesPreprint
Rana, N., Sansanwal, G., Khatter, K., & Singh, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.06529 · Cited by 7
Saleem, S. (2015) · DiVA (Stockholm University) · Cited by 7
Secure Cross-Chain Provenance for Digital Forensics Collaboration
Akbarfam, A. J., Dorai, G., & Maleki, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa62245.2024.00051 · Cited by 6
Knight, G. (2012) · International Journal of Digital Curation · doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.228 · Cited by 6
ENHANCING INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM FORENSICS USING REPLICATION-BASED DIGITAL TWINS
Dietz, M., Englbrecht, L., & Pernul, G. (2021) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88381-2_2 · Cited by 6
AI-Powered Digital Forensics for Industrial Cyber Incidents
Selvakumar, P., Gandhimathi, K., Anjali, Sudheer, P., Anute, N., & Manjunath, T. C. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3241-3.ch022 · Cited by 6
Analisis Investigasi Android Forensik Short Message Service (SMS) Pada Smartphone
Unik, M., & Larenda, V. G. (2019) · JOISIE (Journal Of Information Systems And Informatics Engineering) · doi:10.35145/joisie.v3i1.414 · Cited by 6
Olivier Ribaux, A., Baechler, S., & Rossy, Q. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91735-7_5 · Cited by 6
Moore, J. W., Baggili, I., & Breitinger, F. (2017) · The journal of digital forensics, security and law · doi:10.15394/jdfsl.2017.1414 · Cited by 6
Remote Data Acquisition Using Raspberry Pi3
Ibrahim, S., Harmi, N. A., Naqbi, E. A., Iqbal, F., Mouheb, D., & Alfandi, O. (2018) · IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS) · doi:10.1109/ntms.2018.8328750 · Cited by 6
Setting up digital forensics laboratory: Experience of Zagreb University of Applied Sciences
Žagar, M., Delija, D., & Sirovatka, G. (2018) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.23919/mipro.2018.8400101 · Cited by 6
Towards Scientific Incident Response
Spring, J., & Pym, D. J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01554-1_23 · Cited by 6
Digital Evidence Identification on Google Drive in Android Device Using NIST Mobile Forensic Method
Yudhana, A., Umar, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2019) · Scientific Journal of Informatics · doi:10.15294/sji.v6i1.17767 · Cited by 6
Biohacking Capabilities and Threat/Attack Vectors
Ibarra, J., Jahankhani, H., & Beavers, J. (2020) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_7 · Cited by 6
Forensic Analysis of Advanced Persistent Threat Attacks in Cloud Environments
Liu, C., Singhal, A., & Wijesekera, D. (2020) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56223-6_9 · Cited by 6
Digital Forensics Analysis of Ubuntu Touch on PinePhone
Keim, Y., Yoon, Y. H., & Karabiyik, Ü. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10030343 · Cited by 6
Htun, N. L., & Thwin, M. M. S. (2017) · The International Journal of Engineering and Science · doi:10.9790/1813-0601028292 · Cited by 6
New challenges in digital forensics : online storage and anonymous communication
Mulazzani, M. (2014) · reposiTUm (TU Wien) · doi:10.34726/hss.2014.23982 · Cited by 6
Volatile Memory Acquisition Tools – A Comparison Across Taint And Correctness
Campbell, W. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.4225/75/57b3bfa7fb867 · Cited by 5
Evaluation and Analysis of a Digital Forensic Readiness Framework for the IIoT
Mekala, S. H., Baig, Z. A., Anwar, A., & Syed, N. (2024) · International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) · doi:10.1109/isdfs60797.2024.10526471 · Cited by 5
A Log File Digital Forensic Model
Lalla, H., Flowerday, S., Sanyamahwe, T., & Tarwireyi, P. (2012) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33962-2_17 · Cited by 5
An improved traditional worm attack pattern
Robiah, Y., Rahayu, S. S., Sahib, S., Zaki, M. M., Faizal, M. A., & Marliza, R. (2010) · International Symposium on Information Technology · doi:10.1109/itsim.2010.5561572 · Cited by 5
Embedding a Distributed Auditing Mechanism in the Service Cloud
Alqahtani, S., & Gamble, R. (2014) · IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES) · doi:10.1109/services.2014.22 · Cited by 5
Towards a Model-Based Framework for Forensic-Enabled Cloud Information Systems
Simou, S., Kalloniatis, C., Mouratidis, H., & Gritzalis, S. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44341-6_3 · Cited by 5
An analytical analysis of Turkish digital forensics
Özel, M., Bülbül, H. İ., Yavuzcan, H. G., & Bay, Ö. F. (2018) · Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.diin.2018.04.001 · Cited by 5
Forensic WhatsApp based Android using National Institute of Standard Technology (NIST) Method
Iqbal, M., & Riadi, I. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2019919443 · Cited by 5
A knowledge-based system for supporting the soundness of digital forensic investigations
Gostojić, M. M., & Vuković, Ž. (2023) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301601 · Cited by 5
A Comprehensive Review of Digital Forensics Frameworks for Internet of Things (IoT) Devices
Salem, Y., Owda, M., & Owda, A. Y. (2023) · doi:10.1109/icit58056.2023.10226145 · Cited by 5
“Hello are you available?” Dealing with online frauds and the role of forensic science
Olivier Ribaux, A., & Souvignet, T. R. (2020) · Forensic Science International Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300978 · Cited by 6
Information Fusion-Based Digital Forensics Framework in Cloud Environment
Peng, L., Luo, J., & Li, J. (2020) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd49809.2020.9137434 · Cited by 5
Early Warning System for Cascading Effect Control in Energy Control Systems
Alcaraz, C., Balastegui, A., & López, J. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21694-7_5 · Cited by 5
Digital Forensic Investigation and Cloud Computing
James, J. I., Shosha, A. F., & Gladyshev, P. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6539-2.ch057 · Cited by 5
Digital forensic process model for mobile business devices: smart technologies
Lutui, R. (2015) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 5
Implementing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule:
Marron, J. A. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-66r2.ipd · Cited by 7
RetractedA study of application level information from the volatile memory of Windows computer systems
Olajide, F. (2011) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 5
A Cloud Native Journey for Telecommunication Networks: Components, Applications and Open Challenges
Zeydan, E., Arslan, Ş. S., & Türk, Y. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3801492 · Cited by 4
Metaverse forensics framework: A NIST based investigation framework for metaverse
Shandilya, S. K., Singh, Y., Izonin, I., & Mochurad, L. (2024) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2024.10.005 · Cited by 6
Cho, S., Seong, H., Kang, H., Cho, S.-J., & Kang, B. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111370 · Cited by 4
Cherif, B., Bisztray, T., Dubniczky, R. A., Aldahmani, A., Alshehhi, S., & Tihanyi, N. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4367-0_2 · Cited by 6
Counterfeiting and Defending the Digital Forensic Process
Botas, Á., Rodríguez, R. J., Väisänen, T., & Zdzichowski, P. (2015) · doi:10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.291 · Cited by 4
Ross, R., Pillitteri, V. Y., Guissanie, G., Wagner, R. H., Graubart, R. D., & Bodeau, D. J. (2019) · Cited by 4
Bhardwaj, S., & Dave, M. (2021) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4968-1_53 · Cited by 4
Sztuczna inteligencja i przestpczo przyszoci w kontekcie kryminalistycznych bada informatycznych
Olber, P. (2023) · PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0053.7217 · Cited by 4
Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
Daraghmi, Y.-A., & Shawahna, I. (2023) · Italian National Conference on Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23177548 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., & Dang, H.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W2628759714
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Law › Education, Law, and Society
- Keywords
- forensic computing, digital forensics, incident response, digital evidence, cybersecurity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
