The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guide to integrating forensic techniques into incident response
Open accessAbstract
Reports on Computer Systems TechnologyThe Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems.This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL's research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A single undetected modification can invalidate an entire chain of evidence and compromise legal admissibility (Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012; Stoyanova et al., 2020).”
From Lightweight Tamper-Evident Log Integrity Verification for IoT Edge Environments: A Merkle Tree Pipeline with Adaptive Chunking (2026) · cites this paper as Kent et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When these logs serve as evidence in forensic investigations, compliance audits, or incident-response workflows, their integrity is not merely desirable; it is a hard prerequisite (Kebande and Venter, 2017; Cichonski et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012).”
From Lightweight Tamper-Evident Log Integrity Verification for IoT Edge Environments: A Merkle Tree Pipeline with Adaptive Chunking (2026) · cites this paper as Kent et al., 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carrier, B. D. (2005) · Cited by 568
Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials
Kruse, W. G., & Heiser, J. G. (2001) · Cited by 361
Digital Evidence and Computer Crime
Casey, E. (2000) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 298
Digital Evidence and Computer Crime
Kizza, J. M., & Kizza, F. M. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/9781599043791.ch015 · Cited by 219
The Tao Of Network Security Monitoring: Beyond Intrusion Detection
Bejtlich, R. (2004) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 133
Farmer, D., & Venema, W. (2004) · Cited by 121
Handbook of Computer Crime Investigation : Forensic Tools and Technology
Casey, E. (2001) · Cited by 95
Real Digital Forensics: Computer Security and Incident Response
Jones, K. J., Bejtlich, R., & Rose, C. W. (2005) · Cited by 82
Silence on the wire: a field guide to passive reconnaissance and indirect attacks
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0996 · Cited by 47
Incident Response: Computer Forensics Toolkit
Schweitzer, D. (2003) · Cited by 35
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Honeynet Project. Know Your Enemy: Learning about Security Threats, Second Edition.
- Prosise, Chris, et al. Incident Response and Computer Forensics, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, 2003.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 591
Security for UDNs: A Step Toward 6G
de Ree, M., Parsamehr, R., Vasudevan, V. A., Μαντάς, Γ., Politis, I., Rodrı́guez, J., Kotsopoulos, S. A., Otung, I. E., Martínez-Ortega, J.-F., & Gil‐Castiñeira, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74648-3_5 · Cited by 2
Advanced Trace Pattern For Computer Intrusion DiscoveryPreprint
Rahayu, S. S., Robiah, Y., Shahrin, S., Zaki, M. M., Faizal, M. A., & Zaheera, Z. A. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1006.4569 · Cited by 2
Digital Evidence Management, Presentation, and Court Preparation in the Cloud
Marco, L. D., Le‐Khac, N., & Kechadi, T. (2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119053385.ch14 · Cited by 2
Enhanced Security Requirements for Protecting Controlled Unclassified InformationPreprint
Ross, R. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-172-draft · Cited by 2
Data Integrity: Recovering from Ransomware and Other Destructive Events
McBride, T., Ekstrom, M. P., Lusty, L., Sexton, J., & Townsend, A. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.1800-11 · Cited by 5
Zawoad, S., & Hasan, R. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118821930.ch19 · Cited by 2
Rogers, M. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-382165-2.00325-1 · Cited by 2
Tiwari, N., Baroniya, Y., Bharadwaj, V., Kumar, A., & Srivastava, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1377-0_25 · Cited by 1
A Systematic Literature Review of Latest Cloud Forensic Frameworks, Tools and Challenges
Farooq, U., Shaukat, A., Butt, W. H., & Hassan, A. (2023) · International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Control, and Telecommunication Engineering (ETECTE) · doi:10.1109/etecte59617.2023.10396682 · Cited by 1
Forensic Investigation of Digital Evidence on Flash Disk with Forensic Process Method Based on NIST
Zamsari, F. G. P., & Wahyono, T. (2024) · Jurnal Ecotipe (Electronic Control Telecommunication Information and Power Engineering) · doi:10.33019/jurnalecotipe.v11i1.4489 · Cited by 1
ANALYSIS OF SECURITY INCIDENT INVESTIGATION TECHNOLOGI AT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES
Kozachok, V., & Drapatyi, M. (2024) · Cybersecurity Education Science Technique · doi:10.28925/2663-4023.2024.26.699 · Cited by 1
Digital Forensic on Image Manipulation Crime - A Systematic Literature Review
Yutia, S. N., Triwibisono, C., & Rahmayadi, G. E. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology & Applications (ICICyTA) · doi:10.1109/icicyta64807.2024.10912933 · Cited by 1
Evaluating and Extending Techniques for Fine-Grained Text-Topic Prediction for Digital Forensic Data
Farabi, K. M. A., Agrawal, G., Dorai, G., Bardhan, R., Maleki, H., & Kadri, T. E. (2025) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89360-5_16 · Cited by 1
Zhang, X. (2026) · AI & Future Society · doi:10.63802/afs.v2.i1.208 · Cited by 1
Daniel, S., Seghid, N., Iqbal, F., Marrington, A., MacDermott, Á., & Al-Room, K. (2025) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Next Generation Networks (ICNGN) · doi:10.1109/icngn67480.2025.11413690 · Cited by 1
Risk-Driven Deployment and Forensic Readiness Framework for AI-Enabled Security Operations Centers
Torstensson, O., Prokopovych-Tkachenko, D., Desiatko, A., Hbur, Z. V., & Брітченко, І. (2026) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp6050149 · Cited by 1
Developing New Approaches for Intrusion Detection in Converged Networks
Chen, J. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/13885 · Cited by 1
BUILDING A DIGITAL FORENSIC LABORATORY FOR AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
Falayleh, M. A. (2012) · Cited by 1
PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION OF AN EVIDENCE PRESERVATION METHOD FOR USE IN A COMMON NUMBER SYSTEM
Kobayashi, N. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies · doi:10.7903/ijecs.1394 · Cited by 1
Novel First Responder Digital Forensics Tool as a Support to Law Enforcement
Bogdanoski, M., Stoilkovski, M., & Risteski, A. (2015) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8793-6.ch016 · Cited by 1
Lightweight Proofs of Retrievability for Electronic Evidence in Cloud
Song, X., & Deng, H. (2013) · Information · doi:10.3390/info4030262 · Cited by 1
Aquilina, J. M. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-59749-268-3.00001-3 · Cited by 1
Critical phases in network forensics - a review
Malik, N. M. N. A., Yahya, S., & Abdullah, M. T. (2014) · Cited by 1
Emerging trends and research in digital forensics
Joshi, A. (2014) · Cited by 1
An Intelligent Forensic Framework towards Cloud: Its Ontological Aspects
Datta, S., & Pan, C. (2016) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2016908934 · Cited by 1
Proposing a Digital Operational Forensic Investigation Process .
Bella, M. B., Olivier, M. S., & Eloff, J. H. P. (2011) · Cited by 1
Cajamarca, B. G. L., & Lima, J. S. G. (2017) · Revista Publicando · Cited by 1
Software Agent and Cloud Forensics: A Conceptual Framework
Ahmed, A. I. (2016) · International Journal of Computers · Cited by 1
Fast Tamper Detection for Hierarchical Data in Live Cloud Forensics
Liu, A., & Fu, H. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology · doi:10.1109/eit.2018.8500169 · Cited by 1
Forensic Analysis of Residual Artifacts on Bitnami Hadoop
Oo, M. N., & Lynn, N. (2020) · IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1109/eiconrus49466.2020.9039449 · Cited by 1
Design Framework Forensics Readiness as a Service for Automatic Processing
Kristyan, S. A., Suhardi, S., & Juhana, T. (2020) · International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation · doi:10.1109/icitsi50517.2020.9264965 · Cited by 1
A Common but Flexible Method for IoT Device Forensics
Li, Z., Amer, W., Ruessler, G., Garcia, M., & Liu, X. (2021) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom46510.2021.9685986 · Cited by 1
Kim, J., Lee, S., & Jeong, D. (2022) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14992 · Cited by 1
Taylor, P. J., Mwiki, H., Dehghantanha, A., Akinbi, A., Choo, K. R., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., & Parizi, R. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10543-3_7 · Cited by 1
Labudde, D., Czerner, F., & Spranger, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53801-2_1 · Cited by 1
Internet Addiction and Cybercrime
Schell, B. H. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_26-1 · Cited by 1
Alsmadi, I. M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02360-7_11 · Cited by 1
Roussev, V. (2014) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16768-64 · Cited by 1
Subair, S., Yosif, D., Ahmed, A., & Thron, C. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.54938/ijemdcsai.2022.01.1.37 · Cited by 1
A Brief Review of Network Forensics Process Models and a Proposed Systematic Model for Investigation
Thomas, M., & Meshram, B. B. (2023) · Engineering cyber-physical systems and critical infrastructures · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18497-0_45 · Cited by 1
Digital and IoT Forensic: Recent Trends, Methods and Challenges
Neha, N., Gupta, P., Khan, I. R., & Alam, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-5080-5_6 · Cited by 1
A digital forensic analysis on mozilla firefox browser in Android operating system
Aji, M. P., & Hakim, D. K. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0185760 · Cited by 1
Yeni Adli Bilişim İnceleme Süreci (YABİS)
Oğuz, R., & Eryiğit, R. (2024) · Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.35234/fumbd.1430113 · Cited by 1
Pizzolante, R., Castiglione, A., Mastroianni, M., & Palmieri, F. (2025) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87784-1_11 · Cited by 1
Real-time digital forensic triaging for cloud data analysis using MapReduce on Hadoop framework
Povar, D., Saibharath, N. A., & Geethakumari, G. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics · doi:10.1504/ijesdf.2015.069602 · Cited by 1
Methods for Using Intrusion Logs to Establish Criminal Evidence Against Intruders
Nehinbe, J. O., & Ige, N. J. (2013) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.062 · Cited by 1
Text Mining for Suspicious Contents in Mobile Cloud Computing Environment
Alami, S., & Beqqali, O. E. (2016) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-990-5_10 · Cited by 1
DCF: A novel dynamic forensic framework towards cloud computing environment
Datta, S., Majumder, K., & De, D. (2016) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation · doi:10.1109/ccaa.2016.7813829 · Cited by 1
Malin, C. H., Casey, E., & Aquilina, J. M. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-59749-470-0.00001-2 · Cited by 1
Planning the Selection and Assignment of Security Forensics Countermeasures
Bajramović, E., Bochtler, J., Zid, I. B., & Lainer, A. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science · doi:10.1115/1.4040650 · Cited by 1
Deleted Data Attribution in Cloud Computing Platforms
Alsadhan, A. F., & Alhussein, M. A. (2018) · International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS) · doi:10.1109/cais.2018.8441961 · Cited by 1
The Challenges of Cloud Computing in Forensic Science
Ullah, R. M. U., Buckley, K. A., Garvey, M., & Li, J. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology · doi:10.14445/22312803/ijctt-v67i7p106 · Cited by 1
Simou, S., Kalloniatis, C., Gritzalis, S., & Katos, V. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37545-4_11 · Cited by 1
Ahamad, F., & Khan, M. Z. (2020) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1558-7.ch015 · Cited by 1
Supporting Process Mining with Recovered Residual Data
Englbrecht, L., Schönig, S., & Pernul, G. (2020) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63479-7_27 · Cited by 1
Identifikasi Bukti Forensik Jaringan Virtual Router Menggunakan Metode NIST
Firmansyah, F., Fadlil, A., & Umar, R. (2021) · Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) · doi:10.29207/resti.v5i1.2784 · Cited by 1
Forensic storage framework development using composite logic method
Rachman, H., Sugiantoro, B., & Prayudi, Y. (2021) · ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah · doi:10.33096/ilkom.v13i1.811.58-66 · Cited by 1
La informática forense en dispositivos Android
Rico-Bautista, D. W., & Rueda, J. S. R. (2016) · Revista Ingenio · doi:10.22463/2011642x.2063 · Cited by 1
Digital Forensic Investigation Framework for Dashcam
Alboqami, S., Alkurdi, H., Hinnawi, N., Qazi, E. U. H., & Almorjan, A. (2023) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28332-1_18 · Cited by 1
Challenges in Windows 8 operating system for digital forensic investigations
Goh, T. (2014) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Establishing professional guidelines for SSD forensics: a case study
Uchiyama, J. J. (2014) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Windows Phone 7: implications for digital forensic investigators
Le, Y. (2012) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Scenario Based Worm Trace Pattern Identification TechniquePreprint
Rahayu, S. S., Robiah, Y., Shahrin, S., Zaki, M. M., Irda, R., & Faizal, M. A. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1002.1678 · Cited by 1
Standards and Best Practices in Digital and Multimedia Forensics
Li, S., Dhami, M. K., & Ho, A. T. S. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118705773.ch2 · Cited by 1
Proactive System for Digital Forensic Investigation
Alharbi, S. A. (2014) · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · Cited by 1
Social Media Investigation: Mobile Device Forensics Tools Capabilities
Brennadiva, S. K. (2018) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Cybersecurity: Incident Response
Maras, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69891-5_301-1 · Cited by 1
Decentralized Logging Service using IPFS for Cloud InfrastructurePreprint
Rane, S., Gautam, S., Murali, A., Gore, N., & Koshy, T. S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3419772 · Cited by 1
Fake News Detection: Do Complex Problems Need Complex Solutions?Preprint
Marín, I. P., & Arroyo, D. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3721249 · Cited by 2
IMPLEMENTASI BPMN UNTUK MEMBANGUN MODEL BISNIS FORENSIKA DIGITALPreprint
nopiansah, N. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/hg724 · Cited by 1
Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
Ross, R., & Pillitteri, V. Y. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-171r3.fpd · Cited by 1
RetractedYagiz, M. A., Horasan, F., & Yurttakal, A. H. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.00065
“…these logs serve as evidence in forensic investigations, compliance audits, or incident-response workflows, their integrity is not merely desirable; it is a hard prerequisite (Kebande and Venter, 2017; Cichonski et al., 2012; Kent et al., 2006; International Organization for Standardization, 2012).”
Aquilina, J. M. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-59749-268-3.00004-9
Situational tool and method selection for Digital Forensic Data Collection: performance issues
Pearse, J. G. (2012) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)
Desarrollo de una Guía de Asistencia para el Análisis Forense Informático en un Ambiente Piloto
Pereyra, D. (2014) · El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata)
Research on Forensics Method Based on Log on SaaS
Zeng, G. (2014) · Advanced materials research · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.989-994.4432
Proposal and Evaluation of Safe and Efficient Log Signature Scheme for the Preservation of Evidence
Kobayashi, N., & Sasaki, R. (2014) · IEEE Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW) · doi:10.1109/compsacw.2014.60
Automatic forensic log file analysis for Mac OS X systems
Turedi, Z., & Han, L. (2013) · International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics · doi:10.1504/ijesdf.2013.055050
ON THE SELECTION OF WRITE BLOCKERS FOR DISK ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE PRACTICAL STUDY
Falayleh, M. A., & Al-Karaki, J. N. (2013)
de Wit, J. (2013)
Towards inconspicuous security
Goh, W. (2013) · doi:10.32657/10356/54997
Enquête numérique : les systèmes d’information ont de la mémoire
Gazagne, D. (2016) · Sécurité et stratégie · doi:10.3917/sestr.021.0036
Tellefsen, A. (2012) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
(2007) · Auerbach Publications eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780849383298.ch5
A near-miss analysis model for improving the forensic investigation of software failures
Bella, M. B. (2014) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)
DF-C²M²:a comprehensive capability maturity model for digital forensics organisations
Hanaee, A., & Sulaiman, E. H. S. (2016) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
ACM CCS 2016 Interviews, Part 1
Sadeghi, A., & Zeitouni, S. (2017) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.26
Cloud Collaboration for Forensically Ready Cyber Space
Opara, B. (2015)
Evidence analysis to basis of clustering: Approach based on mobile forensic investigation
Bermad, N., & Kechadi, T. (2017) · International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT) · doi:10.1109/dt.2017.8012118
A Study of Forensic Imaging to Evaluate “Unsanitized” Destination Storage Media
Carlton, G. H., & Kessler, G. C. (2018) · International Journal of Interdisciplinary Telecommunications and Networking · doi:10.4018/ijitn.2018070105
Combining Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks for File Forgery Detection
Κarampidis, K., Deligiannis, I., & Papadourakis, G. M. (2018) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94030-4_12
Approaches for Detection of Digital Evidence in Cloud Computing Environment
Seth, A. D., & Dhanare, R. (2018) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct.2018.8529806
Forensic geotechnical engineering
Patel, A. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817048-9.00010-x
Data and Research Initiatives for Cybersecurity Analysis
Deng, J., & Savas, O. (2017) · Auerbach Publications eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315154374-14
Forensic Cell Site Analysis: Mobile Network Operator Evidence Integrity Maintenance Research
Minor, J. (2019) · The journal of digital forensics, security and law · doi:10.15394/jdfsl.2019.1608
Parkavi, R., Divya, K., & Sherry Ruth, V. (2020) · Advances in digital crime, forensics, and cyber terrorism book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1558-7.ch008
Cloud Computing for Analysis on Digital Forensics Challenges
Vadlamudi, D. (2019) · International journal of digital contents and applications for smart devices · doi:10.21742/ijdcasd.2019.6.1.01
Ocen, G. G., Mugeni, G. B., Karume, S., & Matovu, D. (2024) · DSpace Repository · doi:10.60682/hcy7-5g39
Hosmer, C., Bartolomie, J., & Pelli, R. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809268-2.00005-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent, K., Chevalier, S., Grance, T., & Dang, H.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W2628759714
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Law › Education, Law, and Society
- Keywords
- forensic computing, digital forensics, incident response, digital evidence, cybersecurity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review