The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Neural Regeneration Research
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galletly, C., Castle, D., Dark, F., Humberstone, V., Jablensky, A., Killackey, E., Kulkarni, J., McGorry, P., Nielssen, O., & Tran, N. (2016) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867416641195 · Cited by 877
The neuropathic pain: An overview of the current treatment and future therapeutic approaches
Cavalli, E., Mammana, S., Nicoletti, F., Bramanti, P., & Mazzon, E. (2019) · International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/2058738419838383 · Cited by 499
Embracing failure: What the Phase III progesterone studies can teach about TBI clinical trials
Stein, D. G. (2015) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1065344 · Cited by 249
Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2015) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-015-9285-x · Cited by 168
Does PGC1α/FNDC5/BDNF Elicit the Beneficial Effects of Exercise on Neurodegenerative Disorders?
Jodeiri Farshbaf, M., Ghaedi, K., Megraw, T. L., Curtiss, J., Shirani Faradonbeh, M., Vaziri, P., & Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. (2016) · NeuroMolecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12017-015-8370-x · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, L.
- Venue
- Figshare
- Publisher
- Figshare (United Kingdom)
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4394347623
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Regeneration Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6084/m9.figshare.2007621
- The paper
- Sun, L. (2015). Neural Regeneration Research. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2007621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
