Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health and related indicators 2021

Open access
Ndlovu, Noluthando, Day, Candy, Gray, Andy, Busang, Jacob, Mureithi, Linda·2022·South African Health Review

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide a repository of data, focusing on the national and provincial levels, that describes the broad status of the South African health system (socio-demographic indicators and determinants and health status indicators, as well as health service indicators). Data were sourced primarily from national routine data sources, but also captured major surveys and global reports. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was viewed through multiple lenses. COVID-19 hastened the development of new or improved health information systems or modules to track both the disease and health system inputs and responses. Real-time reporting of incident cases, hospitalisations and mortality was enabled, including weekly estimates of the number of excess deaths associated with the pandemic. Ensuring that these innovations are retained after the pandemic will be important. COVID-19 has also emphasised the need to ensure that all data systems use a common unique identifier. COVID-19 has resulted in many collateral impacts on other aspects of health service delivery and outcomes, and selected examples were reported on, using routine data to illustrate the difference between expected and observed measures. Marked impacts were shown on the Primary Health Care utilisation rate and antenatal care, and on specific disease programmes, such as tuberculosis screening, testing and treatment initiation, HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy initiation and continuity of care. Less dramatic impacts on childhood immunisation coverage were evident from routine data. Community Health Workers have been a vital cadre in the response to COVID-19 and in mitigating disruptions to health service delivery as a result of the pandemic, yet their role in the health system is poorly documented and managed, since they are not included in the mainstream information systems. As South Africa transitions from a pandemic response to the means of managing COVID-19 as an endemic disease, a key task will be to retain what is most useful in health information systems and other innovations, and to ensure that these continue to contribute to the unfinished agenda of universal health coverage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.61473/001c.75480

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Ndlovu, N., Day, C., Gray, A., Busang, J., & Mureithi, L.
Venue
South African Health Review
Published
2022-04-22
Volume
24
ISSN
1025-1715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1513238143
Cited by
253
References
78
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health and related indicators 2021. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.61473/001c.75480
The paper
Ndlovu, N., Day, C., Gray, A., Busang, J., & Mureithi, L. (2022). Health and related indicators 2021. South African Health Review. https://doi.org/10.61473/001c.75480

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.