CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Ancient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesHistorical and Archaeological Studies

Irodalom

Open access
·2023·Késő rézkori temetkezések régészeti és bioarcheológiai elemzése
DOI 10.62150/bm.krt.2023_04
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Irodalom References Bondár Mária PDF DOI: https://doi.org/10.62150/BM.KRT.2023_04 Bondár Mária : Késő rézkori temetkezések régészeti és bioarcheológiai elemzése . Budapest, HUN-REN Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Régészeti Intézet – Archaeolingua 2023, 269–302.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.62150/bm.krt.2023_04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Venue
Késő rézkori temetkezések régészeti és bioarcheológiai elemzése
Publisher
HUN-REN Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont, Régészeti Intézet; MTA Kiváló Kutatóhely
Published
2023
Pages
269-302
DOI
10.62150/bm.krt.2023_04
OpenAlex
W4391903146
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
hu
Open access
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Archaeological Studies
Keywords
funerary practices, bioarchaeology, funerary archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review