The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Quantitative Model for Measuring the Strategic Impact of Financial Analysis on Enterprise Growth
Open accessAbstract
This presents a quantitative model designed to measure the strategic impact of financial analysis on enterprise growth, offering a systematic approach for linking financial intelligence to organizational performance. In an increasingly competitive business environment, enterprises require robust analytical frameworks that enable decision-makers to evaluate the financial implications of strategic initiatives, optimize resource allocation, and enhance long-term value creation. The proposed model integrates key financial metrics such as profitability ratios, liquidity measures, capital efficiency indicators, and growth trends into a structured analytical system capable of quantifying the contribution of financial analysis to enterprise expansion. By employing statistical modeling, regression analysis, and performance attribution techniques, the framework facilitates the identification of critical drivers of growth, evaluates the effectiveness of strategic investments, and forecasts potential outcomes under varying market scenarios. The model also emphasizes the alignment of financial analysis with organizational objectives, ensuring that insights derived from financial data inform strategic planning, risk management, and operational decision-making. Through continuous monitoring and feedback mechanisms, the framework enables enterprises to adapt to evolving economic conditions, regulatory requirements, and market opportunities. Empirical testing across diverse industry contexts demonstrates that organizations adopting this quantitative approach experience improved investment prioritization, enhanced operational efficiency, and accelerated sustainable growth. Furthermore, the model reinforces accountability by linking financial performance to managerial decisions, providing a transparent mechanism for evaluating both financial and strategic outcomes. Overall, this contributes to the field of corporate finance by offering a rigorous, data-driven methodology for assessing the strategic impact of financial analysis on enterprise growth. The findings underscore the importance of integrating quantitative financial evaluation with strategic management practices to enhance decision-making, resource optimization, and long-term organizational resilience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The literature suggests that analytics enhances financial performance by allowing firms to take workforce actions which are not only more accurate and timely but are also economically meaningful (Oduleye, 2023).”
From HR Analytics and Financial Performance: A Quantitative Study of Capability, Integration, and Data-Driven Decision-Making (2026) · cites this paper as Oduleye, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Titilayo Elizabeth Oduleye, Jonathan Jemine Medon (2023) A Quantitative Model for Measuring the Strategic Impact of Financial Analysis on Enterprise Growth. Int j adv multidisc res stud 3(1):1663-1672.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hossain, M. Z., Urme, U. N., & Akash, M. A. U. H. (2026) · European Journal of Management, Economics and Business · doi:10.59324/ejmeb.2026.3(2).06
Aliliele, C., Eboh, E. E., & Odihi, F. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit251117154
Metadata
- Authors
- Elizabeth Oduleye, T., & Jemine Medon, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
- Publisher
- OPRA Publications
- Published
- 2023-02-23
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1663-1672
- ISSN
- 2583-049X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4417355203
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Business, Education, Mathematics Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Keywords
- financial analysis, business growth, strategic impact, financial metrics, profitability ratios, liquidity measures, capital efficiency, performance attribution, resource allocation, value creation, strategic planning, risk management, investment prioritization, managerial accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review