The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AI-Driven Risk Scoring Model for Global Cross-Border Trade Payment Transactions
Open accessAbstract
Global cross-border trade payments involve complex transactional networks, multiple counterparties, and diverse regulatory environments, exposing financial institutions to operational, credit, and compliance risks. Traditional risk management approaches often rely on static rules or post-event reconciliation, limiting the ability to proactively detect potential anomalies and optimize liquidity. This presents an AI-Driven Risk Scoring Model designed to enhance risk management for global cross-border trade payment transactions by integrating predictive analytics, machine learning algorithms, and multi-dimensional data inputs. The proposed model leverages historical payment data, counterparty profiles, transaction metadata, and regulatory compliance information to generate dynamic risk scores for individual transactions in real time. Machine learning techniques, including supervised and unsupervised models, identify patterns indicative of delayed settlements, anomalous behavior, or potential non-compliance. The risk scores enable institutions to prioritize monitoring, allocate liquidity efficiently, and take proactive mitigation measures before high-risk events materialize. A core feature of the model is its integration with operational and compliance workflows. Risk assessment is embedded directly into transaction processing systems, enabling automated alerts, conditional settlement logic, and exception handling. The model also supports regulatory oversight by providing transparent, audit-ready risk metrics that align with AML/KYC standards, sanctions screening, and reporting obligations. This demonstrates that AI-driven risk scoring can significantly improve the predictive accuracy of transaction risk identification, reduce operational delays, and enhance decision-making for cross-border payment settlements. Furthermore, the model’s scalability allows financial institutions to extend their application across multiple jurisdictions, currencies, and trade networks, addressing the challenges of a globally interconnected payment ecosystem. The AI-Driven Risk Scoring Model represents a transformative approach to managing risk in global cross-border trade payments. By combining predictive analytics, machine learning, and real-time integration with operational and compliance systems, the model provides financial institutions with actionable insights, enhanced oversight, and optimized liquidity management, supporting resilient and future-ready trade finance operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Acting on such evidence before problems become crises improves both effectiveness and sustainability (Adesuyi, et al., 2024, Babatope, et al., 2024, Liadi, et al., 2024, Oluwadele, Tawose & Adetumbi, 2024).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Adesuyi, et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Michael Olumuyiwa Adesuyi, Olawole Akomolafe, Babajide Oluwaseun Olaogun, Victor Ukara Ndukwe, Joy Kweku Sakyi (2024) AI-Driven Risk Scoring Model for Global Cross-Border Trade Payment Transactions. Int j adv multidisc res stud 4(1):1569-1581.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aliliele, C., Eboh, E. E., & Odihi, F. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit251117154
Metadata
- Authors
- Olumuyiwa Adesuyi, M., Akomolafe, O., Oluwaseun Olaogun, B., Ukara Ndukwe, V., & Kweku Sakyi, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
- Publisher
- OPRA Publications
- Published
- 2024-02-23
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1569-1581
- ISSN
- 2583-049X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7106554295
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- risk scoring, real-time risk assessment, anomaly detection, liquidity management, regulatory compliance, sanctions screening, automated alerts, trade finance, financial institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review