Criminalizing Battered Mothers
Open accessAbstract
How a domestic violence survivor responds to the abuse she is experiencing depends on many factors. Some critical considerations include her access to resources, desire to stay in her relationship, and assessment of her own safety. Criminal and civil court systems place enormous pressure on survivors to separate from their abusive partners. Not only are survivors with children pressured to leave, they are punished when they stay. That punishment can come in any combination of diminished custody rights, limited parental rights, and incarceration. Yet a survivor who flees with her children is not immune to these same consequences: if she leaves in a manner that is not state sanctioned, she may be punished criminally or civilly for kidnapping her children, regardless of the violence she was experiencing at home. Criminal parental kidnapping charges can cost a survivor her liberty, safety, and relationship with her children. While some state statutes attempt to address the potential for flight from domestic violence, many do not acknowledge the intersection between parental kidnapping and domestic violence at all and none provide sufficient safeguards for battered parents. Survivors are caught in a double bind in which the state can both pressure them to leave abusive relationships and also punish them for the manner in which they do so. A survivor who does not incur criminal parental kidnapping charges may still be negatively impacted by her decision to leave in both the child welfare system and domestic relations court. Large scale systemic change is necessary to truly enhance survivors’ independence. In addition to amending parental kidnapping laws to adequately anticipate and respond to safety seeking defendants, individual attorneys and the larger domestic violence movement must become more willing and better prepared to advocate for all survivors across and outside of the legal system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerns about attracting attention from CPS may discourage mothers from seeking preventative services and accessing shelters altogether.
“Unfortunately, concerns about attracting attention from CPS may discourage mothers from seeking preventative services and accessing shelters altogether (Cross, 2018;Moe, 2009).”
From An intersectional analysis of the feminization of homelessness and mothers’ housing precarity (2020) · cites this paper as Cross, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An intersectional analysis of the feminization of homelessness and mothers’ housing precarity
Bullock, H. E., Reppond, H. A., Truong, S. V., & Singh, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12406 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cross, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cross, Courtney
- Venue
- Utah Law Review
- Publisher
- S.J. Quinney College of Law
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 259
- ISSN
- 0042-1448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811441356
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Utah law review (publishedVersion)
- eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarly Commons - UNLV Boyd Law (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Utah law review
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- domestic violence, battered mothers, parental kidnapping, child custody, parental rights, child welfare system, family court, survivor safety, criminal law reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review