The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage
Open accessAbstract
The Interaction Hypothesis states that the conditions for SLA are crucially enhanced by having L2 learners negotiate meaning (i.e., resolve their miscommunications) with other speakers, native or otherwise (Long & Robinson, 1998, p. 22).This study demonstrates that incidental negotiations commonly occurred in networked learner/learner discussions as well, especially with respect to their lexical confusions.Fifty intermediate L2 Spanish learners were asked to carry out networked discussions in pairs during their lab time using a synchronous chat program, Remote Technical Assistance (RTA), which records all textual entries.Each dyad carried out a series of online tasks that can be described as jigsaw, information-gap, or decision-making.The results show that jigsaw tasks appear to lead the way in promoting negotiations, as Pica, Kanagy, and Falodun (1993) had previously predicated, but that information-gap tasks were not nearly as productive as a stimulus.The findings suggest that computer mediated communication (CMC) can provide many of the alleged benefits ascribed to the Interaction Hypothesis, but with greatly increased possibilities for access outside of the classroom environment.Nevertheless, the predominance of incidental lexical negotiations, in contrast to the paucity of syntactic negotiations, leaves unanswered or unsatisfactorily addressed the issue of grammatical development.The study demonstrates, however, the value of synchronous chat records as a window for investigating interlanguage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573
Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer‐Assisted Language Learning
CHAPELLE, C. A. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x · Cited by 301
Quantitative Research Methods, Study Quality, and Outcomes: The Case of Interaction Research
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x · Cited by 267
"Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a german-american telecollaboration
Ware, P. (2005) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44020 · Cited by 234
Synchronous CMC and Pragmatic Development
Sykes, J. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.399-431 · Cited by 198
Baralt, M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000429 · Cited by 195
EFL learner collaborative interaction in second life
Peterson, M. (2012) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344011000279 · Cited by 158
Using Intelligent Personal Assistants for Second Language Learning: A Case Study of Alexa
Dizon, G. (2017) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.353 · Cited by 130
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.582587 · Cited by 124
Investigating L2 Performance in Text Chat
Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amq007 · Cited by 117
Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse
Liang, M.-Y. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44202 · Cited by 14
Yi, B., & Sun, Z. (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v6n10p120 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, R.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-125
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W12706995
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 88.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.