The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online Learning: Patterns of Engagement and Interaction Among In-Service Teachers
Open accessAbstract
Language teacher education programs attempt to foster collaboration amongst pre-service and in-service teachers.The approach is in place in an online teacher education program in a Midwestern university where the current study was undertaken.Collaborative interactions are an essential element of any pedagogy which assumes that good learning is collaborative and that understanding comes through modeling, participation in, and reaction to the behaviors and thoughts of others.This study was conducted with the following objectives: (a) to analyze the patterns and types of collaborative interactions taking place in three online classes; and (b) to use these findings as a guide in the design of instructional interventions.Our goal is to understand the practice of collaborative teaching and learning so that assistance can be provided to support instructor efforts to include collaborative interactions in their courses.We used Garrison, Anderson, and Archer's ( 2001) "practical inquiry" model as a framework for the study.Without instructors' explicit guidance and "teaching presence," students were found to engage primarily in "serial monologues."Based on the findings, we propose three intervention strategies that may help instructors increase collaborative interactions in online discussions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Additional intervention strategies included clearly outlining participation requirements of the course, asking questions addressing the integration of ideas, and playing a visible role in guiding students towards the achievement of learning goals.
“However, from a pedagogical standpoint, additional intervention strategies included: to clearly outline participation requirements of the course, to ask questions addressing the integration of ideas, and to play a visible role in guiding students towards the achievement of learning goals (Pawan et al. 2003).”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Pawan et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C.-F.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 119-140
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137227662
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 54.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Language learning & technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
- Language learning & technology (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- online learning, collaborative interaction, in-service teachers, teacher professional development, online forums, teaching presence, educational intervention, teacher collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review