The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings
Open accessAbstract
Two experiments investigated the effectiveness of computer-assisted prosody training, its generalization to novel sentences and segmental accuracy, and the relationship between prosodic and lexical information in long-term memory.Experiment 1, using a pretest-posttest design, provided native English-speaking learners of French with 3 weeks of training focused on prosody using a real-time computerized pitch display.Multiple exemplars produced by native speakers (NSs) of French and stored on hard disk provided training feedback.Learners' recorded pre-and posttest productions were presented to NSs for evaluation in two conditions: filtered (unintelligible segmental information) and unfiltered.Ratings using 7-point scales for the prosody and segmental accuracy of unfiltered samples revealed significant improvement in prosody with generalization to segmental production and novel sentences.Comparison of prosody ratings for filtered and unfiltered samples revealed some segmental influence on the pretest ratings of prosody.In Experiment 2, involving a memory recall task using filtered stimuli of reduced intelligibility, learners identified the exact lexical content of an average of 80% of the training sentences based on prosodic cues consistent with exemplar-based learning models.Questionnaire responses indicated a greater awareness of the various aspects of speech and increased confidence in producing another language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
"Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.4.411 · Cited by 1,926
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1894649 · Cited by 913
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408177 · Cited by 788
The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics
Bailey, K. M., Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587214 · Cited by 736
Evidence in Favor of a Broad Framework for Pronunciation Instruction
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00047 · Cited by 651
The Pronunciation Component in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
Morley, J. (1991) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586981 · Cited by 645
Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages
Golombek, P. R., Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329221 · Cited by 599
Is French really syllable-timed?
Wenk, B. J., & Wioland, F. (1982) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30957-x · Cited by 227
Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability
HARDISON, D. M. (2003) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716403000250 · Cited by 226
Self-citationNonsegmental Factors in Foreign Accent
Munro, M. J. (1995) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100013735 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.42 · Cited by 656
The Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu076 · Cited by 431
Parlak, Ö., & Ziegler, N. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000310 · Cited by 58
Training non-native aspirated plosives with hand gestures: learners’ gesture performance matters
Li, P., Xi, X., Baills, F., & Prieto, P. (2021) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1937663 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardison, D. M.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-52
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104054868
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.64152/10125/25228
- The paper
- Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of Computer Assisted Prosody Training: Quantitative and Qualitative Findings. Language Learning & Technology. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.