The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An evaluation of intermediate students' approaches to corpus Investigation
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports on our experience in using a corpus of our own compilation, Contemporary Written Italian Corpus (CWIC), in teaching intermediate students at Griffith University in Australia.After an overview of the corpus design and the training approach adopted, we focus on our initial evaluation of the effectiveness of the students' investigations.Much has been written on what can be done with corpora in language learning: what kinds of discoveries can be made with different types of corpora.There is relatively little on how learners actually go about investigations.Since we intend for our students to progress from classroom use to independent work as a result of using a Web-based version of CWIC, we have been seeking to understand how successful they are at extracting information from this corpus in the absence of a teacher.Our initial study highlighted the complexity of the process and the specialized skills required.We found that lack of rigor in observation and reasoning contributed greatly to the problems that arose, as did ignorance of common pitfalls and techniques for avoiding them.We, therefore, conclude the paper with an outline of proposed changes to our apprenticeship program, aimed at better equipping the students as "corpus researchers."
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002 · Cited by 386
Concordancing in L2 writing class: an overview of research and issues
Yoon, C. (2011) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.003 · Cited by 94
Sustainability and computer-assisted language learning: factors for success in a context of change
Kennedy, C., & Levy, M. (2009) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220903345218 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 77-90
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109706358
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of intermediate students' approaches to corpus Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.64152/10125/44567
- The paper
- Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2001). An evaluation of intermediate students' approaches to corpus Investigation. Language Learning & Technology. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.