The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism
Abstract
The appearance of systematic barriers to economic advance in the course of capitalist expansion—the ‘development of underdevelopment’—has posed difficult problems for Marxist theory. There has arisen, in response, a strong tendency sharply to revise Marx’s conceptions regarding economic development. In part, this has been a healthy reaction to . . .
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A certain Marxism resisted the interventions of dependency and neocolonialism theory, suppressing the role of primitive accumulation while building a historical interpretation of capitalism with origins essentially in domestic British class structures and polemicizing against autocentered development for the periphery.
“A certain Marxism resisted these interventions, suppressing the role of primitive accumulation while building a historical interpretation of capitalism with origins essentially in domestic British class structures and polemicizing against autocentered development for the periphery (Brenner, 1977).”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Brenner, 1977
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Brenner, R.
- Venue
- New Left Review
- Publisher
- New Left Review
- Published
- 1977-07-31
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 104
- Pages
- 25-92
- ISSN
- 0028-6060
- 2044-0480
- DOI
- 10.64590/9sc
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
