CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Education, Achievement, and GiftednessGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Growth mindset interventions yield impressive results

Dweck, Carol·2018·The Conversation
DOI 10.64628/aai.apnnnxxe5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64628/aai.apnnnxxe5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions in 2018 elicited conflicting conclusions: Sisk et al. concluded effects were small and cautioned they may be due to extraneous factors; Dweck concluded the same effects were substantive and supported mindset theory.

    “The first meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions in 2018 (which did not account for study quality) elicited conflicting conclusions: The meta-analysis authors (Sisk et al., 2018) concluded that effects of growth mindset interventions on academic achievement were small and cautioned they may be due to extraneous factors; Dweck (2018), the developer of mindset theory, concluded that the same”

    From Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. (2023) · cites this paper as Dweck (2018)

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dweck, C.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Dweck, Carol
ORCID
Dweck, Carol
Venue
The Conversation
Publisher
The Conversation Media Group Ltd
Published
2018-06-26
DOI
10.64628/aai.apnnnxxe5
OpenAlex
W4413674491
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Conversation (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
growth mindset, mindset intervention, intervention effectiveness, self-efficacy, achievement motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review