Fast Generalized Longitudinal Functional Principal Components Analysis with Applications to Population-Level Neuronal Dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Functional data are widely collected across many fields. One approach for modeling functional data collected across repeated measures is longitudinal functional PCA (LFPCA), which allows for the decomposition of variability at multiple levels. However, existing estimation approaches for LFPCA can be computationally demanding for large or high-dimensional datasets. Here, we propose fast generalized LFPCA, a novel estimation technique that bins data along the functional domain and fits a marginal mixed model at each bin. Simulation results show that the proposed method is orders of magnitude faster than existing techniques while achieving similar accuracy, making LFPCA scalable to datasets with more densely sampled observations and larger sample sizes. We apply the proposed technique to model neuronal firing rate data both on and off deep brain stimulation (DBS) to investigate how the intervention modulates population-level neuronal activity. Our results suggest that the vast majority of between-neuron variation can be explained by four principal components, which relate to individual differences in neuronal firing as well as the arm manipulation paradigm under study. We also find that DBS significantly increases the variability of firing activity, likely driven by increased firing from a subset of neurons in response to DBS, a novel insight not obtained in previous analyses. Code to implement the proposed method and run simulation studies is included in the supplement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Duffy, K. A., Pai, N., Schneck, D., Kozienko, G., Zheng, L., Xenopoulos-Oddsson, A., Wang, J., Johnson, L. A., Vitek, J. L., Fiecas, M., & Cui, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Duffy, Kelly A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2026-10-18
- OpenAlex
- W7222890958
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- University of Minnesota
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- fast estimation, functional data, neuronal firing rate, deep brain stimulation, individual differences, computational scalability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review