Observational Learning by Reinforcement Learning
Open accessAbstract
Observational learning is a type of learning that occurs as a function of observing, retaining and possibly imitating the behaviour of another agent. It is a core mechanism appearing in various instances of social learning and has been found to be employed in several intelligent species, including humans. In this paper, we investigate to what extent the explicit modelling of other agents is necessary to achieve observational learning through machine learning. Especially, we argue that observational learning can emerge from pure Reinforcement Learning (RL), potentially coupled with memory. Through simple scenarios, we demonstrate that an RL agent can leverage the information provided by the observations of an other agent performing a task in a shared environment. The other agent is only observed through the effect of its actions on the environment and never explicitly modeled. Two key aspects are borrowed from observational learning: i) the observer behaviour needs to change as a result of viewing a 'teacher' (another agent) and ii) the observer needs to be motivated somehow to engage in making use of the other agent's behaviour. The later is naturally modeled by RL, by correlating the learning agent's reward with the teacher agent's behaviour.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A survey of robot learning from demonstration
Argall, B. D., Chernova, S., Veloso, M., & Browning, B. (2009) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.024 · Cited by 3,227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silver, D., Singh, S., Precup, D., & Sutton, R. S. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103535 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Open Problems in Cooperative AI
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08630 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Learning few-shot imitation as cultural transmission
Bhoopchand, A., Brownfield, B., Collister, A., Dal Lago, A., Edwards, A., Everett, R., Fréchette, A., Oliveira, Y. G., Hughes, E., Mathewson, K. W., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42875-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning
Cook, J., Lu, C., Hughes, E., Leibo, J. Z., & Foerster, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.00392 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Behavioral Cloning [Pomerleau, 1988] Inverse RL [Russell, 1998] Observational Learning by RL [Borsa et al., 2017] Emergent Social Learning [Ndousse et al., 2021] Learning Few-Shot Imitation [Bhoopchand et al., 2023] Generational Training Kickstarting [Schmittetal., 2018] X-Land [Stooke et al.,…”
- Authors
- Borsa, D., Heess, N., Piot, B., Liu, S., Hasenclever, L., Munos, R., & Pietquin, O.
- Affiliations
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE Computer Society
- Published
- 2019-05-08
- Pages
- 1117-1124
- ISSN
- 1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2914
- OpenAlex
- W2964014957
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- observational learning, reinforcement learning, social learning, imitation, emergent learning, memory, reward function design, multi-agent learning, shared environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review