Cited by 47Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMachine Learning and Algorithms

Observational Learning by Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Borsa, Diana, Heess, Nicolas, Piot, Bilal, Liu, Siqi, Hasenclever, Leonard, Munos, Remi, Pietquin, Olivier·2019·International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Abstract

Observational learning is a type of learning that occurs as a function of observing, retaining and possibly imitating the behaviour of another agent. It is a core mechanism appearing in various instances of social learning and has been found to be employed in several intelligent species, including humans. In this paper, we investigate to what extent the explicit modelling of other agents is necessary to achieve observational learning through machine learning. Especially, we argue that observational learning can emerge from pure Reinforcement Learning (RL), potentially coupled with memory. Through simple scenarios, we demonstrate that an RL agent can leverage the information provided by the observations of an other agent performing a task in a shared environment. The other agent is only observed through the effect of its actions on the environment and never explicitly modeled. Two key aspects are borrowed from observational learning: i) the observer behaviour needs to change as a result of viewing a 'teacher' (another agent) and ii) the observer needs to be motivated somehow to engage in making use of the other agent's behaviour. The later is naturally modeled by RL, by correlating the learning agent's reward with the teacher agent's behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.65109/nqzd5621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borsa, D., Heess, N., Piot, B., Liu, S., Hasenclever, L., Munos, R., & Pietquin, O.
Affiliations
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Published
2019-05-08
Pages
1117-1124
ISSN
  • 1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2914
OpenAlex
W2964014957
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
observational learning, reinforcement learning, social learning, imitation, emergent learning, memory, reward function design, multi-agent learning, shared environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review