Demonstrating Social Error Recovery with AgentFactory
Abstract
In real world applications, agents - be they software agents or autonomous robots - inevitably face erroneous situations that have not been planned for. Re-planning can sometimes provide solutions to problems, but it is computationally expensive and rarely practical. We argue that replanning is not necessarily the last resort. Instead, during erroneous circumstances, agents should always take advantage of other agents in their environment. In this paper we report on early work that looks at Social Error Recovery as a particular class of exception handling that allows agents to resolve erroneous situations that are beyond their direct control. We also show how the AgentFactory Framework and its language AF-APL have been directly extended to support a basic model of Social Error Recovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction
Tian, L., & Oviatt, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3439720 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ross, R., Collier, R., & O'Hare, G. M. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Bremen (DE)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- ORCID
- Collier, Rem
- Venue
- International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
- Publisher
- IEEE Computer Society
- Published
- 2004-07-19
- Pages
- 1424-1425
- ISSN
- 1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2914
- OpenAlex
- W7124137332
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Keywords
- exception handling, multi-agent systems, error recovery, autonomous robots, software agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review