Cited by 2Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesDistributed systems and fault tolerance

Demonstrating Social Error Recovery with AgentFactory

Ross, Robert, Collier, Rem, O'Hare, G. M. P.·2004·International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Abstract

In real world applications, agents - be they software agents or autonomous robots - inevitably face erroneous situations that have not been planned for. Re-planning can sometimes provide solutions to problems, but it is computationally expensive and rarely practical. We argue that replanning is not necessarily the last resort. Instead, during erroneous circumstances, agents should always take advantage of other agents in their environment. In this paper we report on early work that looks at Social Error Recovery as a particular class of exception handling that allows agents to resolve erroneous situations that are beyond their direct control. We also show how the AgentFactory Framework and its language AF-APL have been directly extended to support a basic model of Social Error Recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.65109/uzwq4116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, R., Collier, R., & O'Hare, G. M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Published
2004-07-19
Pages
1424-1425
ISSN
  • 1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2914
OpenAlex
W7124137332
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
exception handling, multi-agent systems, error recovery, autonomous robots, software agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review