The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Employees Have Useful Information About Firms' ESG Practices?
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1287/mnsc.2024.07258
Abstract
This study evaluates whether employees have useful information about firms' ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) practices. Analyzing 10 million employee reviews, it reveals that 43% of reviews discuss ESG topics, with governance surprisingly receiving substantial attention. Assembling novel hard-to-manipulate ESG indicators, including emissions estimates from satellite imagery, the study finds that employees' ESG inside view is more informative about these indicators than existing ESG ratings. Moreover, the inside view appears robust to ESG cheap talk, as low-cost changes in firms' ESG commitments do not affect it, while costlier changes do. Thus, employee perspectives can help investors assess firms’ authentic ESG performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This could also extend to employees in other countries as Briscoe-Tran (2023) employs employees' reviews posted on Glassdoor.comand finds that employees have access to information useful for assessing firms' ESG practices.”
From Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values (2023) · cites this paper as Briscoe-Tran (2023)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Aggarwal, Reena, Isil Erel, René Stulz, and Rohan Williamson, 2009, Differences in Governance Practices Between U.S. and Foreign Firms: Measurement, Causes, and Consequences, Review of Financial Studies 22, 3131-3169.
- Akey, Pat, and Ian Appel, 2021, The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution, The Journal of Finance 76, 5-55.
- Baker, Andrew C., David F. Larcker, and Charles C.Y. Wang, 2022, How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-in-Differences Estimates?, Journal of Financial Economics 144, 370-395.
- Bebchuk, Lucian A., Alma Cohen, and Allen Ferrell, 2009, What Matters in Corporate Governance?, The Review of Financial Studies 22, 783-827.
- Bebchuk, Lucian A., and Roberto Tallarita, 2022, Will Corporations Deliver Value to All Stakeholders?, Forthcoming, Vanderbilt Law Review 75.
- Berg, Florian, Julian F. Koelbel, and Roberto Rigobon, 2022, Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings, Review of Finance 26, 1315-1344.
- Bertomeu, J, E Cheynel, E Floyd, and W Pan, 2021, Using Machine Learning to Detect Misstatements, Review of Accounting Studies.
- Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duflo, and Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004, How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 249-275.
- Bialkowski, Jedrzej Pawel, Laura T. Starks, and Moritz Wagner, 2024, Cultural Values and Cross-Country Differences in Responsible Investing Sectors, Available at SSRN 4938888.
- Chatterji, Aaron K., Rodolphe Durand, David I. Levine, and Samuel Touboul, 2016, Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers, Strategic Management Journal 37, 1597-1614.
- Christensen, Dane M., George Serafeim, and Anywhere Sikochi, 2021, Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings, The Accounting Review 97, 147-175.
- Chung, Kee H., and Hao Zhang, 2011, Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 46, 247-273.
- Cornaggia, Jess, and Kimberly Cornaggia, 2023, ESG Ratings Management, Available at SSRN 4520688.
- Devlin, Jacob, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova, 2018, BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. · arXiv
- Duchin, Ran, Janet Gao, and Qiping Xu, 2022, Sustainability or Greenwashing: Evidence from the Asset Market for Industrial Pollution, Available at SSRN.
- Dyck, Alexander, Karl V. Lins, Lukas Roth, and Hannes F. Wagner, 2019, Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 131, 693-714.
- Dyck, Alexander, Adair Morse, and Luigi Zingales, 2010, Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?, The Journal of Finance 65, 2213-2253.
- Dyck, Alexander, Adair Morse, and Luigi Zingales, 2024, How Pervasive Is Corporate Fraud?, Review of Accounting Studies 29, 736-769.
- Edmans, Alex, 2009, Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia, The Journal of Finance 64, 2481-2513.
- Edmans, Alex, 2011, Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices, Journal of Financial Economics 101, 621-640.
- Eskildsen, Marc, Markus Ibert, Theis Ingerslev Jensen, and Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2024, In Search of the True Greenium, SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Gao, Lei, Jie Jack He, and Juan Julie Wu, 2021, Standing Out from the Crowd Via CSR Engagement: Evidence from Non-Fundamental-Driven Price Pressure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1-50.
- Gong, Ping, and Jacob K. Thomas, 2023, Thumb on the Scale: Do Employers Manage Glassdoor Reviews?, Available at SSRN 4460625.
- Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021, Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing, Journal of Econometrics 225, 254-277.
- Green, T. Clifton, Ruoyan Huang, Quan Wen, and Dexin Zhou, 2019, Crowdsourced Employer Reviews and Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Economics 134, 236-251.
- Grewal, Jody, and George Serafeim, 2020, Research on Corporate Sustainability: Review and Directions for Future Research, Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 14, 73-127.
- Hacamo, Isaac, 2023, Racial Prejudice in the Workplace and Sales Boycotts, Available at SSRN 4033827.
- Hanley, Kathleen Weiss, and Gerard Hoberg, 2019, Dynamic Interpretation of Emerging Risks in the Financial Sector, The Review of Financial Studies.
- Hassan, Tarek A, Stephan Hollander, Laurence van Lent, and Ahmed Tahoun, 2019, Firm-Level Political Risk: Measurement and Effects, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134, 2135-2202.
- He, Yazhou Ellen, Bige Kahraman, and Michelle Lowry, 2023, ES Risks and Shareholder Voice, . Ed. Itay Goldstein The Review of Financial Studies 36, 4824-4863.
- Healy, Paul M., and James M. Wahlen, 1999, A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting, Accounting horizons 13, 365-383.
- Heath, Davidson, Daniele Macciocchi, Roni Michaely, and Matthew C. Ringgenberg, 2023, Does Socially Responsible Investing Change Firm Behavior?, Review of Finance.
- Hoberg, Gerard, and Gordon Phillips, 2016, Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation, Journal of Political Economy 124, 1423-1465.
- Hoepner, Andreas G. F., Ioannis Oikonomou, Zacharias Sautner, Laura T. Starks, and Xiaoyan Zhou, 2020, ESG Shareholder Engagement and Downside Risk, SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Huang, Kelly, Meng Li, and Stanimir Markov, 2020, What Do Employees Know? Evidence from a Social Media Platform, The Accounting Review 95, 199-226.
- Ji, Yuan, Oded Rozenbaum, and Kyle Welch, 2017, Corporate Culture and Financial Reporting Risk: Looking Through the Glassdoor, Available at SSRN 2945745.
- Kamiya, Shinichi, Jun-Koo Kang, Jungmin Kim, Andreas Milidonis, and René M. Stulz, 2021, Risk Management, Firm Reputation, and the Impact of Successful Cyberattacks on Target Firms, Journal of Financial Economics 139, 719-749.
- Klein, April, and Emanuel Zur, 2009, Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other Private Investors, The Journal of Finance 64, 187-229.
- Li, Kai, Feng Mai, Rui Shen, and Xinyan Yan, 2021, Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning, The Review of Financial Studies 34, 3265-3315.
- Loughran, Tim, and Bill McDonald, 2016, Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey, Journal of Accounting Research 54, 1187-1230.
- Lucas Jr, Robert E., 1976, Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique, Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (North-Holland).
- Marinescu, Ioana, Andrew Chamberlain, Morgan Smart, and Nadav Klein, 2021, Incentives Can Reduce Bias in Online Employer Reviews, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27, 393-407.
- Masulis, Ronald W., and Syed Walid Reza, 2015, Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy, Review of Financial Studies 28, 592-636.
- Matos, Pedro, 2020, ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World: A Critical Review, CFA Institute Research Foundation.
- Mayzlin, Dina, Yaniv Dover, and Judith Chevalier, 2014, Promotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation, American Economic Review 104, 2421-2455.
- Mikolov, Tomas, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado, and Jeff Dean, 2013, Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Mohanram, Partha, and Dan Gode, 2013, Removing Predictable Analyst Forecast Errors to Improve Implied Cost of Equity Estimates, Review of Accounting Studies 18, 443-478.
- Pástor, Ľuboš, Robert F. Stambaugh, and Lucian A. Taylor, 2022, Dissecting Green Returns, Journal of Financial Economics 146, 403-424.
- Raghunandan, Aneesh, and Shiva Rajgopal, 2021, Do Socially Responsible Firms Walk the Talk?, SSRN Electronic Journal, 45.
- Raghunandan, Aneesh, and Shivaram Rajgopal, 2023, Do Socially Responsible Firms Walk the Talk?, Forthcoming, Journal of Law and Economics.
- Rajan, Raghuram, Pietro Ramella, and Luigi Zingales, 2023, What Purpose Do Corporations Purport? Evidence from Letters to Shareholders, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Sautner, Zacharias, Laurence Van Lent, Grigory Vilkov, and Ruishen Zhang, 2023, Firm-Level Climate Change Exposure, The Journal of Finance 78, 1449-1498.
- Sheng, Jinfei, 2022, Asset Pricing in the Information Age: Employee Expectations and Stock Returns, Available at SSRN 3321275.
- Tang, Dragon Yongjun, Jiali Yan, and Chelsea Yaqiong Yao, 2022, The Determinants of ESG Ratings: Rater Ownership Matters, Proceedings of Paris December 2021 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC.
- Thorndike, Edward L., 1920, A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology 4, 25-29.
- Welch, Kyle, and Aaron Yoon, 2020, Do High Ability Managers Choose ESG Projects that Create Shareholder Value? Evidence from Employee Opinions, SSRN Journal.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values
STARKS, L. T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13255 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Briscoe-Tran, H.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Briscoe-Tran, Hoa
- ORCID
- Briscoe-Tran, Hoa
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2023-04-01
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7171419188
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Alberta
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Keywords
- ESG practices, employee reviews, ESG ratings, ESG commitments, corporate governance, environmental performance, social performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review