Cited by 0Ethics in Business and EducationBiblical Studies and InterpretationWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

A Defense of Biblical Ethics in Business

Open access
Locke, Larry G., Shelton, Taelyn, Smith, Baylee·2021·Journal of Biblical Integration in Business

Abstract

The application of biblical ethics in mainstream American business has long been displaced by more modern theories of ethics, such as utilitarianism and contractarianism. As the Enlightenment period introduced a greater focus on rationalism and individualism, business people began to find biblical ethics to be an unworkable approach to contemporary business problems. In this article, the authors will argue that biblical ethics is a viable tool to be used in resolving ethical issues in modern business settings. The authors will first provide a high-level overview of the history of biblical ethics as a model for businesses and consider why it fell into disuse. They will then examine the modern alternatives of utilitarianism and contractarianism and provide examples in which those theories failed to protect businesses from unethical behavior. The authors will then demonstrate the presence of these ethical alternatives within the Bible and defend biblical ethics as providing a more complete and reliable ethical source in the modern business setting. They will finally contend that the perceived complexity in applying biblical ethics to business problems is actually an opportunity for Christian business people to grow in sanctification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.69492/jbib.v24i1.600

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cafferky, M. (2017). The time value of morality. Journal of Biblical Integration in Business, 20(2), 5-9. https://cbfa-jbib.org/ index.php/jbib/article/view/466/478
  2. Carnegie, A. (1889). Wealth. The North American Review, 148(391), 653-664. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25101798?seq=3 -meta- data_info_tab_contents
  3. Cudd, A., & Eftekhari, S. (2018). Contractarianism. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, E. N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stan- ford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/contractarianism
  4. Harrison, R. (2003). Locke, Hobbs, and confusion's masterpiece. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Lantos, G. P. (2002). How Christian character education can help overcome the failure of secular education. Journal of Biblical Integration in Business, 8(1), 19-52.
  6. Locke, J. (1689). Second treatise. The University of Chicago Press, 1(16), 3. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/ v1ch16s3.html
  7. Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Harvard University Press.
  8. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2017). Lewisville medical practice sued by EEOC for religious discrimi- nation and retaliation. Press Release.

Authors
Locke, L. G., Shelton, T., & Smith, B.
Affiliations
University of Mary Hardin–Baylor (US)
Venue
Journal of Biblical Integration in Business
Published
2021-11-18
Volume
24
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1527-0602 (ISSN-L)
  • 2577-2171
OpenAlex
W3214400108
Cited by
0
References
16
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The journal of biblical integration in business. (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Repository of LCC International University (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
biblical ethics, business ethics, utilitarianism, contractarianism, Christian business, sanctification, history of business ethics, Enlightenment rationalism, individualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review