Practical strategies for instructional faculty and librarians designing accessible instructional materials
Open accessAbstract
While discussions of the accessibility of instructional materials are not new, librarians and instructional faculty are facing increased pressure to ensure the accessibility of their materials in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic’s rapid shift to online education. Many faculty and librarians, however, do not receive adequate training and support in the area of accessible design. In addition, there is often confusion about who is responsible for ensuring the accessibility of instructional materials in higher education environments. This paper presents practical strategies for librarians and instructional faculty to identify readily available resources, create inventories of their own instructional materials, identify common accessibility errors and remediate those materials. The paper presents a brief overview of accessibility terminology and legislation before focusing on three common types of instructional objects: presentation slides, instructional videos and content pages in learning management systems (LMS). For each type of object, it discusses common accessibility errors associated with the format, connecting those errors to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), as well as available tools to check the accessibility of the materials. The rising use of artificial intelligence (AI) in accessibility checkers is also discussed. Identifying the types of accessibility errors made in the design of their own materials provides a productive way for faculty and librarians to learn about and apply accessibility principles to their own instructional design process. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This practitioner-oriented paper offers a pragmatic workflow for instructional faculty and librarians to improve the accessibility of their own teaching materials, focusing on three common object types: presentation slides, instructional videos, and LMS content pages. It argues that remediating existing materials is a realistic entry point for learning accessibility principles, especially given inadequate institutional training and unclear responsibility for accessibility.
Key findings
- The paper recommends a four-step approach: conduct an informal internal environmental scan of institutional policies and resources, build an inventory of one's own instructional materials (spreadsheet with title, object type, format, usage, priority, notes), identify common accessibility errors, and remediate using available tools.
- It maps common errors to specific WCAG success criteria: reading order (1.3.2), colour contrast (1.4.3, minimum 4.5:1 for AA compliance of most standard-sized text), alt text (1.1.1), captions and audio description (1.2), heading structure (2.4.6), and meaningful links (2.4.4).
- Format matters for remediation: Microsoft PowerPoint allows marking images as decorative and has a built-in accessibility checker, while Google Slides does not and requires the third-party Grackle Workspace (paid after a free trial). Canvas's built-in checker only checks one page at a time, whereas UDOIT scans all course pages at once and checks embedded video captions.
- Automated checkers are insufficient: they cannot detect every error or judge alt-text quality, and no single automated video checker exists, so manual checks are typically required. AI-generated alt text and captions should always be reviewed by a content expert.
- The paper cites prior work finding uneven faculty readiness and insufficient accessibility training (Guilbaud et al.), similar gaps in LIS graduate programmes, and widespread uncertainty about who is responsible for online accessibility (Linder et al.), alongside lack of resources and time (Lowenthal et al.).
- It notes the 2024 ADA Title II final rule sets WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the minimum, with compliance deadlines of 24th April, 2026 for public universities with 50,000 or more students and 26th April, 2027 for those with fewer than 50,000.
Methods
- Conceptual/practical guidance paper, not an empirical study; it presents strategies, terminology, legislation overview, and tool comparisons rather than collecting or analysing data.
- Scope is deliberately limited to three instructional object types — presentation slides, videos, and LMS content pages — with worked examples of common errors and remediation tools (e.g., PowerPoint accessibility assistant, WebAIM contrast checker, ASU Image Accessibility Generator, UDOIT, Blackboard Ally).
- No stated sample, dataset, or formal analysis method; the paper synthesises existing literature and publicly available resources.
Limitations
- The paper states no formal limitations section. Limitations evident from the text: the legislation and compliance discussion is US-centric (Rehabilitation Act, ADA, WCAG), so guidance may not transfer directly to other jurisdictions.
- Coverage is restricted to three object types and does not address accessible PDF creation in depth (it advises posting slides in original format instead), and the tool landscape described is time-sensitive given rapid AI developments.
- The recommendations are not empirically evaluated; the paper offers no outcome data on whether the proposed remediation workflow improves accessibility in practice.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Many faculty and librarians do not receive adequate training and support in the area of accessible design.
“Many faculty and librarians, however, do not receive adequate training and support in the area of accessible design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Self-created materials, inherited materials, and third party materials are subject to accessibility requirements by the individual active user.
“All three of those types of material -self-created materials, inherited materials, and third party materials -are subject to accessibility requirements by the individual active user.26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There is often confusion about who is responsible for ensuring the accessibility of instructional materials in higher education environments.
“In addition, there is often confusion about who is responsible for ensuring the accessibility of instructional materials in higher education environments.”
- Also stated in: § Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal · plain
“Connected with a lack of accessibility training is confusion regarding who on campus is responsible for accessibility issues and policies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal · plain
- Premisecitation
Studies of graduate programmes in library and information science revealed a similar lack of training in accessibility and disability issues for librarians.
“Studies of graduate programmes in library and information science revealed a similar lack of training in accessibility and disability issues for librarians.21,22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Accessibility is required by law.
“One distinguishing characteristic of accessibility is that it is required by law.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Premisecitation
Training and support for faculty and librarians on accessibility requirements and tools varies greatly from institution to institution.
“Training and support for faculty and librarians on accessibility requirements and tools also varies greatly from institution to institution.7,8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Studies have found that little to no training on accessibility is available.
“Faculty and librarians need to have a general knowledge of the terminology and legislation associated with accessibility to create effective instructional materials; however, studies have found that little to no training on accessibility is available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Merely spelling out a URL will not be helpful to someone using a screen reader, because the screen reader will read out the URL without providing information about the target link.
“Merely spelling out a uniform resource locator (URL) will not be helpful to someone using a screen reader, because the screen reader will read out the URL without providing information about the target link.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Not all videos require audio description.
“While all videos with sound will require captions to be accessible, not all videos require audio description.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In most cases, educational video creators will need to perform manual checks of their videos.
“In most cases, educational video creators will need to perform manual checks of their videos.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 70
- May combine two claims. 32
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWCAG guidelines identify three levels of conformance for success criteria: A is the lowest, AA the middle, and AAA the highest.
“The guidelines identify three levels of conformance for success criteria included in those four principles, with A being the lowest, AA the middle and AAA the highest.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn the US, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the ADA of 1990 are two key pieces of legislation.
“In the US, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the ADA of 1990 are two key pieces of legislation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2024, a final rule was added to Title II of the ADA to require state and local government web content and mobile applications, including those of public colleges and universities, to meet specific digital accessibility standards.
“In 2024, a final rule was added to Title II of the ADA to require state and local government web content and mobile applications, including those of public colleges and universities, to meet specific digital accessibility standards.17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe PowerPoint checker will flag hard-to-read text using the minimum contrast level.
“While the PowerPoint checker will flag hard-toread text using that minimum level, creators may identify difficult-to-read slides through visually inspecting the slides.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLinder et al. also note that many institutions lack a single-point person or office for accessibility and instead rely on overburdened and overwhelmed staff or faculty who have not been formally trained in the work.
“Linder et al. 24 also note that many institutions lack a single-point person or office for accessibility and instead rely on overburdened and overwhelmed staff or faculty who have not been formally trained in the work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIndicating the format of the object or the platform used to host the object helps the creator select accessibility tools to check and remediate the content.
“Indicating the format of the object or the platform used to host the object helps the creator select accessibility tools to check and remediate the content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe types of errors in instructional materials depend on what kind of instructional object is being evaluated.
“The types of errors in instructional materials will depend on what kind of instructional object is being evaluated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and debates over the possible benefits and pitfalls these tools and technologies pose to accessibility.
“Any discussion of designing online learning objects would also be remiss if it failed to acknowledge the rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and debates over the possible benefits and pitfalls these tools and technologies pose to accessibility. 9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicrosoft PowerPoint enables users to mark an image as decorative, indicating to a screen reader that the content can be skipped without losing meaning, while Google Slides does not.
“For example, while Microsoft PowerPoint enables users to mark an image as decorative, indicating to a screen reader that the content can be skipped without losing meaning, Google Slides does not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThree common types of accessibility errors in presentation slides that require more than an initial scan with an automated checker are incorrect reading order of objects, inadequate contrast between background and foreground elements, and missing or poorly written alt text.
“Three examples of common types of accessibility errors in presentation slides that require more than an initial scan with an automated checker are the incorrect reading order of objects, inadequate contrast between background and foreground elements, and missing or poorly written alt text.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe format of instructional materials affects both the ability to develop accessible content and the available accessibility checkers for that content.
“The format of the materials, such as whether the slides were created in Microsoft PowerPoint or Google Slides, affects both the ability to develop accessible content and the available accessibility checkers for that content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAudio description describes visual elements that cannot be understood from the main soundtrack and is helpful to those with visual impairments.
“Audio description is used to describe visual elements that cannot be understood from the main soundtrack; they are helpful to those with visual impairments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe W3C alt decision tree can help users determine whether an image requires alternative text.
“The W3C alt decision tree can help users determine whether an image requires alternative text, 30 while WebAIM's alt text guide provides specific recommendations for writing effective alt text.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGuilbaud et al. revealed uneven levels of readiness for faculty across multiple disciplines to design and deliver accessible online courses and found that most faculty receive insufficient training in accessibility.
“Guilbaud et al. 20 revealed uneven levels of readiness for faculty across multiple disciplines to design and deliver accessible online courses and found that most faculty receive insufficient training in accessibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCaptions and audio description are addressed in WCAG success criterion 1.2, which falls under the perceivable principle.
“Two accessibility elements that are unique to audio-visual materials are captions and audio description, both addressed in success criterion 1.2, which falls under the perceivable principle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningStarting with remediating existing content can be a valuable step in achieving the goal of proactively designing accessible materials.
“The paper presents a pragmatic approach to design, acknowledging that even though proactively designing accessible materials is the goal of many instructors, starting with remediating existing content can be a valuable step in achieving that goal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMicrosoft's checker will automatically identify the reading order of content on each slide, but the user must manually inspect that reading order to ensure that it is correct.
“While Microsoft's checker will automatically identify the reading order of content on each slide, the user must manually inspect that reading order to ensure that it is correct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRunning accessibility checks on one's own materials can be a beneficial way to learn about accessible design while also starting the process of remediation.
“Running accessibility checks on one's own materials can also be a beneficial way to learn about accessible design while also starting the process of remediation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe four principles of WCAG are POUR: content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.
“The four principles of WCAG are referred to as POUR, specifying that content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMeeting a minimum standard for the contrast between foreground text (and images of text) and the background is part of the perceivable principle in WCAG, namely criterion 1.4.3.
“Meeting a minimum standard for the contrast between foreground text (and images of text) and the background is also part of the perceivable principle in WCAG, namely criterion 1.4.3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTitle II of the ADA extended the protections of the Rehabilitation Act to apply to all postsecondary institutions, even those that did not receive federal funding.
“Title II of the ADA extended the protections of the Rehabilitation Act to apply to all postsecondary institutions, even those that did not receive federal funding.16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWCAG does not provide detailed guidelines on the number of words or characters in a caption line or the level of detail required for audio descriptions.
“WCAG does not provide detailed guidelines on the number of words or characters that should be included in a caption line or the level of detail required for audio descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWebAIM's alt text guide provides specific recommendations for writing effective alt text.
“The W3C alt decision tree can help users determine whether an image requires alternative text, 30 while WebAIM's alt text guide provides specific recommendations for writing effective alt text.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAutomated accessibility checkers will not identify every type of error or provide clear guidance on how to correct all errors.
“It is worth noting that automated checkers will not identify every type of error or provide clear guidance on how to correct all errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe Rehabilitation Act prohibits discriminating against people with a disability in federally funded programmes and agencies.
“The Rehabilitation Act prohibits discriminating against people with a disability in federally funded programmes and agencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLearning about common types of accessibility errors in one's own materials and how to correct those can assist faculty and librarians in avoiding common pitfalls when designing new materials.
“Learning about common types of accessibility errors in their own materials and how to correct those can assist faculty and librarians in avoiding common pitfalls when designing new materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) were developed by an international group, the W3C, to provide recommendations for making web content accessible.
“The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) were developed by an international group, the W3C, to provide recommendations for making web content accessible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGrackle Workspace integrates with Google Docs and Google Sheets as well as Google Slides, but there is a cost associated with the software after a free trial period.
“Grackle Workspace integrates with Google Docs and Google Sheets as well as Google Slides, but there is a cost associated with the software after a free trial period.28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNot all materials used for a course are created by the instructor; sometimes faculty inherit materials or course modules from previous instructors, or they link to third party materials such as YouTube videos.
“It is worth noting that not all materials used for a course are created by the instructor.Sometimes faculty inherit materials or course modules from previous instructors, or they link to third party materials such as YouTube videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe minimum contrast level identified for AA compliance of most standard-sized text is 4.5:1.
“The minimum contrast level identified for AA compliance of most standard-sized text is 4.5:1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAn inventory can help faculty and librarians identify and prioritise frequently used materials.
“In either case, an inventory can help faculty and librarians identify and prioritise frequently used materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLinder et al. contend that the question of responsibility for online accessibility is commonly asked across many campuses, and there is often a high level of uncertainty and anxiety regarding the answer.
“Linder et al. 23 contend that the question of responsibility for online accessibility is commonly asked across many campuses, and there is often a high level of uncertainty and anxiety regarding the answer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicrosoft PowerPoint has a built-in accessibility checker, while Google Slides does not and requires the use of a third party tool called Grackle Workspace.
“Another difference is that Microsoft PowerPoint has a built-in accessibility checker, while Google Slides does not and requires the use of a third party tool called Grackle Workspace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSome considerations, such as adequate colour contrast and having alternative text (alt text), apply to multiple objects, such as presentation slides and webpages in an LMS, while other features, such as closed captions and audio descriptions, are unique to audio-visual materials.
“Some considerations, such as adequate colour contrast and having alternative text (alt text), apply to multiple objects, such as presentation slides and webpages in an LMS, while other features, such as closed captions and audio descriptions, are unique to audio-visual materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThere are no universally agreed guidelines for creating captions and audio descriptions.
“Creating captions and audio descriptions can be difficult for those starting out, because there are no universally agreed guidelines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLowenthal et al. identify additional challenges, such as the lack of resources and time required for faculty and staff to address accessibility issues.
“In addition to recognising inadequate training for faculty and staff and the confusion over who is responsible for accessibility, Lowenthal et al. 25 also identify additional challenges, such as the lack of resources and time required for faculty and staff to address accessibility issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWCAG specifies different requirements for pre-recorded versus live videos.
“WCAG also specifies different requirements for pre-recorded versus live videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProviding alt text for non-text content, such as photographs, icons and charts, is key to making content perceivable; it is listed as WCAG criterion 1.1.1.
“Like colour contrast, providing alt text for non-text content, such as photographs, icons and charts, is key to making content perceivable; it is listed as criterion 1.1.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe rapid shift to online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic intensified discussions and scrutiny of accessible instructional materials.
“As many recognise, however, the rapid shift to online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic intensified these discussions, as online materials faced greater attention and scrutiny than in previous times.3,4,5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenHaving alt text is necessary for those with visual impairments who use a screen reader to understand the meaning of an image.
“As with reading order, having alt text is necessary for those with visual impairments who use a screen reader to understand the meaning of an image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCaptions provide visual equivalents for audio information, including speech and non-speech sounds, for people with hearing impairments.
“Captions provide visual equivalents for audio information, encompassing both speech and non-speech sounds, included in the video for people with hearing impairments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe reading order of various elements on a single slide is important for those using screen readers to ensure that content is read in a logical sequence.
“The reading order of various elements on a single slide (eg the title, images or content boxes) is important for those using screen readers to ensure that content is read in a logical sequence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe most recent update to the ADA stipulates that the minimum level of compliance is now WCAG 2.1, Level AA.
“The most recent update to the ADA stipulates that the minimum level of compliance is now WCAG 2.1, Level AA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRunning accessibility checks on one's own materials helps users identify their own design habits and preferences, which can be influenced by their discipline or background.
“This helps users identify their own design habits and preferences, which can be influenced by their discipline or background.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe ADA final rule sets compliance dates based on population size; public universities with 50,000 or more students must comply by 24th April, 2026, while those with fewer than 50,000 have until 26th April, 2027.
“The final rule also sets compliance dates based on population size; public universities with 50,000 or more students must comply by 24th April, 2026, while those with fewer than 50,000 have until 26th April, 2027.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAutomated checkers can detect whether an image has alt text, but they do not provide feedback on what objects or images require alt text or on the quality of that text.
“Automated checkers can detect whether an image has alt text, but they do not provide feedback on what objects or images require alt text or on the quality of that text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe DCMP Captioning Key provides details on caption length and content.
“The DCMP provides details on caption length and content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe reading order requirement falls under WCAG's success criterion 1.3.2, which is part of the perceivable principle.
“This requirement falls under WCAG's success criterion 1.3.2,which is part of the perceivable principle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHeading structure falls under WCAG success criterion 2.4.6 in the operable section.
“Heading structure falls under success criterion 2.4.6 in the operable section of WCAG.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs with any automated checker, UDOIT will not detect every possible error in a course.
“As with any automated checker, UDOIT will not detect every possible error in a course.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Canvas checker will highlight the error on the page and provide a brief explanation of the error in the sidebar.
“As with the built-in checker in PowerPoint, the Canvas checker will highlight the error on the page and provide a brief explanation of the error in the sidebar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPresentation slides are relatively easy to remediate after creation, while videos can be more difficult, particularly in adding audio descriptions.
“While presentation slides are relatively easy to remediate after they have been created, videos can be more difficult, particularly in terms of adding audio descriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSome newer products incorporating AI, such as Subly, will scan completed videos for common accessibility issues, but such tools are not free.
“There are some newer products incorporating AI, such as Subly, that will scan completed videos for common accessibility issues, but tools like these are not free.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTwo common accessibility concerns when designing LMS content pages are employing appropriate heading structure and creating meaningful hyperlinks.
“Two common accessibility concerns when designing LMS content pages, as when designing webpages in general, are employing the appropriate heading structure and creating meaningful hyperlinks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany well-known LMS companies, such as Canvas, have built-in accessibility checkers.
“Many well-known LMS companies, such as Canvas, have built-in accessibility checkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome well-known vendors such as 3PlayMedia are incorporating AI in their workflows, and newer companies such as Echo Labs use AI along with human review, but those vendors charge a fee.
“Some wellknown vendors in this area are beginning to incorporate AI in their workflows, such as 3PlayMedia, and other newer companies, such as Echo Labs, are using AI along with human review in their process, but those vendors charge a fee for the service.34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenNo single automated video checker exists to identify all such accessibility issues at once.
“No single automated video checker exists to identify all such accessibility issues at once.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAdding audio description to a completed video requires more technical expertise than adding captions.
“Adding audio description to a completed video requires more technical expertise than adding captions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPlatforms such as Canva and Adobe Premier automatically generate captions, and video hosting sites such as YouTube and Vimeo provide automatic captioning.
“Platforms used to create and edit videos, such as Canva and Adobe Premier, will automatically generate captions, and video hosting sites, such as YouTube and Vimeo, also provide automatic captioning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenOne downside of the Canvas checker is that it only checks one page at a time.
“One downside of the Canvas checker is that it only checks one page at a time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAll videos with sound require captions to be accessible.
“While all videos with sound will require captions to be accessible, not all videos require audio description.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAudio description is only required when there are visual elements in the video that are not described or mentioned in the main audio track.
“Audio description is only required when there are visual elements in the video that are not described or mentioned in the main audio track.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUDOIT scans all pages all at once and provides a single report of accessibility errors for the course pages as a whole.
“The other benefit of UDOIT is that it scans all pages all at once and provides a single report of the accessibility errors for the course pages as a whole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCreating accessible PDFs is a more complicated process, requiring additional knowledge of accessibility, than creating accessible slides or documents in their original formats.
“Creating accessible pdfs is a more complicated process, requiring additional knowledge of accessibility, than creating accessible slides or documents in their original formats.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFree or low-cost programs that auto-generate captions are not available for audio descriptions.
“While there are several free or low-cost programs that will auto-generate captions, such tools are not available for audio descriptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRemediation of a completed video is more complex than that of presentation slides because there are many accessibility issues to consider, such as captioning, audio description and colour contrast.
“Remediation of a completed video is also more complex than that of presentation slides because there are many accessibility issues to consider, such as captioning, audio description and colour contrast.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningVague links like 'click here' or 'read more' are unhelpful because they do not provide users with information about the unique site or source being linked to.
“Vague links like 'click here' or 'read more' are similarly unhelpful, as they do not provide users with information about the unique site or source being linked to.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLink purpose falls under the operable category in WCAG and corresponds to success criterion 2.4.4.
“Like heading structure, link purpose falls under the operable category in WCAG, and corresponds to success criterion 2.4.4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenUDOIT will check for the presence of captions on any embedded videos.
“In addition, UDOIT will check for the presence of captions on any embedded videos (see Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenUDOIT identifies three categories of accessibility barriers: known barriers, potential barriers and review suggestions, to help users prioritise remediation according to WCAG 2.1 AA compliance.
“UDOIT identifies three categories of accessibility barriers: known barriers, potential barriers and review suggestions, to help users prioritise remediation according to WCAG 2.1 AA compliance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAccessibility is a complex topic, and having some basic knowledge of accessibility terminology and laws is necessary for faculty and librarians to create accessible and effective instructional materials.
“Accessibility is a complex topic, and having some basic knowledge of accessibility terminology and laws is necessary for faculty and librarians to create accessible and effective instructional materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many faculty and librarians do not have adequate support from their institutions to devote the time and energy necessary to learn about accessibility, remediate existing materials and proactively design new accessible materials.
- Rests on an assumption: Confusion over who is responsible for accessibility at one's college or university can add to the strain felt by faculty and librarians.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUDOIT provides detailed information about accessibility errors and offers more specific guidance on how to correct errors compared to the built-in checker in Canvas.
“UDOIT provides detailed information about accessibility errors and offers more specific guidance on how to correct errors in comparison to the built-in checker in Canvas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe process of creating captions has become easier in recent years due to technological advancements in converting speech to text.
“The process of creating captions has become easier in recent years due to technological advancements in converting speech to text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe Rich Content Editor in Canvas has a tool that checks common areas, such as sequential headings, presence of alt text, and contrast ratio for text.
“The Rich Content Editor in Canvas has a tool that will check common areas, such as the use of sequential headings, the presence of alt text and the contrast ratio for text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAdditional AI platforms for captioning include Otter.ai and Clipchamp.
“Additional AI platforms for captioning include Otter.ai and Clipchamp.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Presentation slides, instructional videos, and online modules in learning management systems are commonly used types of instructional materials.
“Rather than tackling multiple types of materials, the paper focuses on three commonly used types: presentation slides, videos, and online modules in learning management systems (LMS).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many faculty and librarians do not have adequate support from their institutions to devote the time and energy necessary to learn about accessibility, remediate existing materials and proactively design new accessible materials.
“Moreover, many faculty and librarians do not have adequate support from their institutions to devote the time and energy necessary to learn about accessibility, remediate their existing materials and proactively design new accessible materials.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Confusion over who is responsible for accessibility at one's college or university can add to the strain felt by faculty and librarians.
“Confusion over who is responsible for accessibility at one's college or university can also add to the strain felt by faculty and librarians, as they may be forced to tackle these issues on their own.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Basham, J. D., Blackorby, J. and Marino, M. T. (2020), 'Opportunity in crisis: The role of Universal Design for Learning in educational redesign', Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 71-91.
- Heidt, A. (2024), 'Generative AI can be a boon for accessibility', Nature, Vol. 628, No. 8007, pp. 462-463.
- Pionke, J. (2023), 'What are library graduate students learning about disability and accessibility?: A syllabus analysis', Urban Library Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
- Authors
- Trnka, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trnka, Rachel E.
- ORCID
- Trnka, Rachel E.
- Venue
- Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal
- Publisher
- Henry Stewart Publications
- Published
- 2026-03-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272
- ISSN
- 2755-1377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7142729466
- Semantic Scholar
- e045d43a2d859a8545777f39a1304d7dd342de72
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Advances in online education. (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- accessible design, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, accessibility errors, presentation slides, educational videos, virtual learning environments, accessibility legislation, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-19.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-19.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review