The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Law and Politics
Open accessAbstract
The status of Quebec has been debated before its inception as a province.It has long sought greater autonomy within Canada, leading to ongoing debates about nationalism, federalism, and potential sovereignty.The Quebec question remains a central issue in Canadian politics, reflecting the province's unique cultural, linguistic, and historical identity.This paper uses a mixed methodology to explore the historical background of the Quebec question and the current leanings of domestic and foreign actors to understand the scope of the situation.Two referendums on independence resulted in narrow defeats for sovereignty, but the desire for recognition as a distinct society persists.The province continues to assert its autonomy through increased international engagement and economic self-sufficiency.However, the economic and political consequences of secession pose significant challenges.While tensions have eased in recent years, debates about Quebec's place in Canada remain relevant.Differing views on multiculturalism and federalism between Quebec and the rest of Canada complicate efforts to resolve the issue.This article concludes that despite the ongoing tension and debate, Quebec will remain a part of Canada.Moving forward, a complete resolution to the Quebec question will require continued dialogue, compromise, and respect for the province's identity within the broader Canadian framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ownership versus competition: Efficiency in public enterprise
Vining, A. R., & Boardman, A. E. (1992) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/bf00145092 · Cited by 489
Beyond Marble Cakes and Picket Fences: What U.S. Federalism Scholars Can Learn from Comparative Work
Weissert, C. S. (2011) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381611000855 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Law and Politics
- Publisher
- International Balkan University
- Published
- 2024-06-06
- ISSN
- 2671-342X (ISSN-L)
- 2671-3438
- OpenAlex
- W4399386971
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Law and Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.69648/hmhr5756
- The paper
- Journal of Law and Politics. (2024). Journal of Law and Politics. https://doi.org/10.69648/hmhr5756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.