African elephant reintegration from captivity to wild living: quantifying the detailed behavioural changes
Open accessAbstract
There is increasing evidence of compromised welfare for captive African savannah elephants managed in confined spaces. With the trend for zoos and captive facilities to close due to public pressure, reflecting ethical concerns, and thier limited capacity to manage 'difficult' behaviours, elephants will continue to require rehabilitation into free-ranging areas or living in the wild. During reintegration from captivity into a free-roaming system, conservation management methods need to be carefully considered to ensure the individual’s welfare. Elephants, have a sophisticated social life and exhibit complex body language employing a multitude of behavioural signals and gestures to demonstrate thier needs and feelings. These detailed signals could be valuable when assessing the welfare status of elephants as any large deviation in behaviour could indicate changes in elephant wellbeing. In this study, a group of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored as they transitioned from captivity to a free-roaming system. To track the impact of reintegration on elephant welfare, we recorded frequencies of behaviours categorized as Ambivalent, Assessing, Frustrated, and Social, and ofspecific behaviours within each category, across four phases of reintegration into the wild (Stables, Boma, Release and Free). Significant differences in rates between reintegration phases were observed for several categories of behaviour and specific behaviours. Decreased frequencies of Frustrated behaviours and an increase in social behaviours when the elephants were Free were potentially indicative of improved welfare in wild settings. We conclude that monitoring of behaviours is important when assessing elephant welfare, and to establish the success of reintegration operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Socializing a group of male Asian elephants in a semi-captive facility in Lao PDR
López Pérez, A. B., Brown, J. L., Goldenberg, S. Z., Rey, A., & Khonmee, J. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332944 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“One key aspect is understanding elephant behavior and social dynamics in the wild, the lack of which could be detrimental to the proper management of captive counterparts [3,4].”
Roos, T., Eggeling, T., Garaï, M. E., Boult, V. L., Ganswindt, A., Mitchell, B., & Delsink, A. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0348698
“Studies reporting on the adaptability and flexibility of rewilded elephants are few and far between [14,26,30,59,60], especially those that have monitored elephants who have been roaming free for almost a decade.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Eggeling, T., Roos, T., Boult, V. L., Mitchell, B., & Steyn, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Reading (GB)
- Venue
- Pachyderm
- Publisher
- Species Survival Commission
- Published
- 2024-11-25
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 70-83
- ISSN
- 1026-2881 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404697250
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Pachyderm (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (ncas10016)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- African savannah elephant, Loxodonta africana, elephant welfare, behavior change, body language, social behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review