Cited by 0Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPublic Health Policies and EducationSocial Policies and Family

South Korea’s existential public health emergency: Tackling the low birth rate, loneliness, and suicide crisis

Open access
Na, Peter J., Ryoo, Hae-Won, Kim, Jim Yong·2024·IGEE Proceedings

Abstract

South Korea is facing a critical public health emergency characterized by a rapidly declining birth rate, increasing loneliness, and high suicide rates. The fertility rate dropped to 0.72 children per woman in 2023, significantly below the OECD average. This decline is attributed to economic burdens, gender inequality, and changing societal norms. If these trends continue, the youth population could halve by 2040 compared to 2023, severely impacting the nation’s economy and demographic structure. Simultaneously, loneliness has become a significant issue, with over a third of Koreans living alone and a rise in deaths from isolation, particularly among middle-aged and older men. South Korea also faces a severe mental health crisis, marked by high rates of depression and the highest suicide rate among OECD countries for the past 25 years. Troublingly, recent trends indicate an increase in suicides among younger age groups. Efforts to address these issues have included government initiatives for mental health support, but these remain underfunded and insufficient compared to international standards. Additionally, the stigma surrounding mental health persists. South Korea can learn from countries like Japan and the UK, which have implemented successful interventions focusing on social integration and mental health. Addressing these intertwined crises requires collective action and a robust policy response to ensure a sustainable future for South Korea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.69841/igee.2024.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Durkheim, É. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology. Free Press.
  2. Goeschel, C. (2009). Suicide in Nazi Germany. Oxford University Press.
  3. Okamura, K., Ikeshita, K., Kimoto, S., Makinodan, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2021). Suicide prevention in Japan: Government and community measures and high-risk interventions. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 13(1). e12408https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12408Article · DOI

Authors
Na, P. J., Ryoo, H.-W., & Kim, J. Y.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Na, Peter J.
Venue
IGEE Proceedings
Published
2024-09-30
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
50-53
ISSN
  • 3022-5183 (ISSN-L)
  • 3022-5191
OpenAlex
W4402997617
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IGEE proceedings (Online) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
Keywords
low birth rate, fertility decline, loneliness, suicide, mental health crisis, population aging, gender inequality, mental health stigma, mental health policy, social isolation, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review