The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deepfakes and Cheap Fakes: The Manipulation of Audio and Visual Evidence
Open accessAbstract
SOCIETY -4 -"AV manipulation includes both the cutting edge, AI-reliant techniques of
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If misinformation is so rare in the information environment of wealthy, democratic countries, it is thanks to the hard work of professionals-journalists, fact checkers, experts, etc.-and to the norms and know-how that have developed over time in these professions.
“If misinformation is so rare in the information environment of wealthy, democratic countries, it is thanks to the hard work of professionals -journalists, fact checkers, experts, etc. -and to the norms and know-how that have developed over time in these professions (e.g., Paris and Donovan, 2019; Silverman, 2014).”
From Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown (2023) · cites this paper as Paris and Donovan, 2019
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection
Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08685 · Cited by 497
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Richard Abel, Encyclopedia of Early Cinema (Taylor & Francis, 2004);
- John Pultz, The Body and the Lens: Photography 1839 to the Present, First edition (New York: Harry N Abrams Inc., 1995).
- Clare McGlynn, Erika Rackley, and Ruth Houghton, "Beyond 'Revenge Porn': The Contin- uum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse," Feminist Legal Studies 25, no. 1 (April 1, 2017): 25-46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2. · DOI · Paper page
- McGlynn, Rackley, and Houghton, "Beyond 'Revenge Porn'"; Danielle Keats Citron and Mary Anne Franks, "Criminalizing Revenge Porn," SSRN Scholarly Paper (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, May 19, 2014), https://papers.ssrn.com/ abstract=2368946.
- McGlynn, Rackley, and Houghton, "Beyond 'Revenge Porn'"; Citron and Franks, "Crimi- nalizing Revenge Porn"; Feona Attwood, "No Money Shot? Commerce, Pornography and New Sex Taste Cultures," Sexualities 10, no. 4 (October 1, 2007): 441-56, https://doi. org/10.1177/1363460707080982. · DOI
- Walter S. DeKeseredy and Martin D. Schwartz, "Thinking Sociologically About Im- age-Based Sexual Abuse: The Contribution of Male Peer Support Theory," Sexualiza- tion, Media, & Society 2, no. 4 (October 20, 2016): 237462381668469, https://doi. org/10.1177/2374623816684692.p 6. · DOI
- Citron, "Addressing Cyber Harassment"; Citron and Franks, "Criminalizing Revenge Porn." While this is generally true in online porn communities, pornographic practice is by no means monolithic. The production of pornography by and for women, LGBTIQ individuals, and people of color highlights that these groups have agency in producing and enjoying their own counter-hegemonic pornographic content. The higher degree of visibility and access to sexual culture for these groups might be described as liberatory, or more radically democratic. In this vein, Feona Attwood suggests that altporn in the form of SuicideGirls and Nerve.com represent "participatory cultures which serve corporate and community needs" which can be understood as radically democratic. (Feona Attwood, "No Money Shot? Commerce, Pornography and New Sex Taste Cultures," Sexualities 10, no. 4 (October 1, 2007): 441-56, https://doi. org/10.1177/1363460707080982.) · DOI
- Robert Chesney and Danielle Keats Citron, "Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security," SSRN Scholarly Paper (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, July 14, 2018), https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3213954;
- M. C. Elish and danah boyd, "Situating Methods in the Magic of Big Data and AI," Communication Monographs 85, no. 1 (January 2, 2018): 57-80, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130. · DOI
- Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes, "The Internet Will Not Break: Denying Bad Samaritans § 230 Immunity," Ford- ham Law Review 86, no. 2 (November 1, 2017): 401;
- Citron and Franks, "Criminalizing Revenge Porn." 93 Donald Mackenzie, "Uninventing the Bomb?" Medicine and War 12, no. 3 (October 22, 2007): 202-11, https://doi.org/10.1080/13623699608409285. · DOI
- H. R. Hasan and K. Salah, "Combating Deepfake Videos Using Blockchain and Smart Contracts," IEEE Access 7 (2019): 41596-606, https://doi.org/10.1109/AC- CESS.2019.2905689. 100 · DOI · Paper page
- Danielle Keats Citron, Hate Crimes in Cyberspace, Reprint edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016);
- Danielle Keats Citron and Helen Norton, "Intermedi- aries and Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship for Our Information Age," Boston University Law Review 91 (2011): 1435.Reprint edition (Place of publication not identified: Harvard University Press, 2016 104
- Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes, "The Internet Will Not Break: Denying Bad Samar- itans § 230 Immunity," Fordham Law Review 86, no. 2 (November 1, 2017): 401;
- Mary Anne Franks and Danielle Citron, "Criminalizing Revenge Porn," Wake Forest Law Review 49 (2014): 345-92;
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown
Simon, F. M., Altay, S., & Mercier, H. (2023) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-127 · Cited by 85
Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T., & Vliegenthart, R. (2025) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2388079 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Paris, B., & Donovan, J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Paris, Britt
- Publisher
- Data & Society Research Institute
- Published
- 2019-09-18
- OpenAlex
- W7123748963
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
- Keywords
- deepfakes, sound manipulation, AI-generated content, disinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
