CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Freedom of Expression and DefamationEthics and Social Impacts of AIHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Content or Context Moderation?: Artisanal, Community-Reliant, and Industrial Approaches

Open access
Caplan, Robyn·2018
DOI 10.69985/owpr3156
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Adrian Chen, "Inside Facebook's Outsourced Anti-Porn and Gore Brigade, Where 'Camel Toes' are More Offensive Than 'Crushed Heads.' Gawker.com,(2012), http://gawker.com/5885714/inside-facebooks-outsourced-anti-porn-and-gore-brigade-where-camel-toes-are-more-offensive-than-crushed-heads.The Guardian, "The Facebook Files," The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/news/series/facebook-filesJulia Angwin, "Facebook's Secret Censorship Rules

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.69985/owpr3156

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Caplan, R.
Corresponding author
Caplan, Robyn
ORCID
Caplan, Robyn
Publisher
Data & Society Research Institute
Published
2018-11-14
DOI
10.69985/owpr3156
OpenAlex
W7123857906
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
content moderation, Facebook, censorship, user-generated content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content or Context Moderation?: Artisanal, Community-Reliant, and Industrial Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.69985/owpr3156
The paper
Caplan, R. (2018). Content or Context Moderation?: Artisanal, Community-Reliant, and Industrial Approaches. https://doi.org/10.69985/owpr3156