Cited by 42AI and HR TechnologiesEthics and Social Impacts of AIImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Transparency, privacy, and accountability in AI-enhanced HR processes

Open access
Reddy Yanamala, Kiran Kumar·2024·Journal of Advanced Computing Systems

Abstract

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Resource Management (HRM) has transformed how organizations approach recruitment, performance evaluations, employee engagement, and workforce planning. Despite AI’s potential to improve efficiency and reduce human biases, it also introduces significant ethical challenges, particularly in areas such as fairness, transparency, and privacy. This study develops a comprehensive theoretical framework that equips HR managers with the competencies necessary to ethically govern AI-augmented HRM processes. The framework focuses on five key areas: bias detection and mitigation, fairness in AI-driven decisions, transparency and explainability, privacy and data protection, and accountability and oversight. It also provides actionable strategies for integrating these ethical competencies into organizational AI governance through continuous training, policy development, and collaboration with AI specialists. Theoretical analysis, supported by a probability model, demonstrates the positive impact of ethical governance on mitigating bias and promoting fairness in AI-augmented decision-making. The findings highlight the importance of proactive ethical governance in ensuring that AI systems align with organizational values and legal standards, fostering trust among employees and stakeholders. This paper’s contributions fill a gap in the current literature by offering practical guidance for HR managers to navigate the ethical complexities of AI in HRM. Future research should empirically test this framework in various organizational contexts to assess its long-term impact on AI governance in HRM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.69987/jacs.2023.30302

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. P. Tambe, P. Cappelli, and V. Yakubovich, "Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward," Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 15-42, Aug. 2019.
  2. H. Zhu, "Impact of artificial intelligence on human resource management and its countermeasures," in 2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture, Manchester United Kingdom, 2021.
  3. R. Baeza-Yates, "Ethical Challenges in AI," in Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Virtual Event AZ USA, 2022.
  4. C. Green and A. Clayton, "Ethics and AI Innovation," The International Review of Information Ethics, vol. 29, Mar. 2021.
  5. A. Charlwood and N. Guenole, "Can HR adapt to the paradoxes of artificial intelligence?," Hum. Resour. Manag. J., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 729-742, Nov. 2022.
  6. P. Boddington, "How AI challenges professional ethics," in Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 59-65.
  7. A. Gupta and M. Mishra, "Ethical concerns while using Artificial Intelligence in recruitment of employees," Bus. Ethics Lead.., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 6-11, 2022.
  8. R. Rodrigues, "Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities," Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 4, no. 100005, p. 100005, Dec. 2020.
  9. C. Addis and M. Kutar, "AI management an exploratory survey of the influence of GDPR and FAT principles," in 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) , Leicester, United Kingdom, 2019.
  10. A. Baird and B. Schuller, "Considerations for a more ethical approach to data in AI: On data representation and infrastructure," Front. Big Data, vol. 3, p. 25, Sep. 2020.
  11. N. Naik et al., "Legal and ethical consideration in Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: Who takes responsibility?," Front. Surg., vol. 9, p. 862322, Mar. 2022.
  12. K. Siau and W. Wang, "Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics," J. Database Manag., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 74-87, Apr. 2020.
  13. A. B. Brendel, M. Mirbabaie, T.-B. Lembcke, and L. Hofeditz, "Ethical management of artificial intelligence," Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1974, Feb. 2021.
  14. J. Zhou, F. Chen, A. Berry, M. Reed, S. Zhang, and S. Savage, "A survey on ethical principles of AI and implementations," in 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Canberra, Australia, 2020.
  15. D. F. Mujtaba and N. R. Mahapatra, "Ethical considerations in AI-based recruitment," in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), Medford, MA, USA, 2019.
  16. S. Tolmeijer, M. Christen, S. Kandul, M. Kneer, and A. Bernstein, "Capable but amoral? Comparing AI and human expert collaboration in ethical decision making," in CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans LA USA, 2022.
  17. H. Yu, Z. Shen, C. Miao, C. Leung, V. R. Lesser, and Q. Yang, "Building ethics into artificial intelligence," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
  18. T. Lysaght, H. Y. Lim, V. Xafis, and K. Y. Ngiam, "AI- assisted decision-making in healthcare: The application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research," Asian Bioeth. Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 299- 314, Sep. 2019.
  19. B. C. Stahl and D. Wright, "Ethics and privacy in AI and big data: Implementing responsible research and innovation," IEEE Secur. Priv., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 26- 33, May 2018.
  20. R. Stefan and G. Carutasu, "How to approach ethics in intelligent decision support systems," in Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 25- 40.
  21. E. Aizenberg and J. van den Hoven, "Designing for human rights in AI," Big Data Soc., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 205395172094956, Jul. 2020.
  22. A. Trunk, H. Birkel, and E. Hartmann, "On the current state of combining human and artificial intelligence for strategic organizational decision making," Bus. Res., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 875-919, Nov. 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy Yanamala, K. K.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Computing Systems
Published
2024
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
10-18
ISSN
3066-3962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403485296
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 1
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence in human resource management, AI ethics, algorithmic bias, transparency and explainability, employee privacy, data protection, accountability, AI governance, recruitment, performance evaluation (human resources), employee engagement, workforce planning, organizational trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review