Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intermittent vs Continuous Graded Exercise Test for VO2max in College Soccer Athletes

Mier, Constance, Alexander, Ryan·2011·International Journal of Exercise Science

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if a 1-min active recovery between stages during a graded exercise test (GXT) would result in a higher stage intensity and maximum oxygen uptake in college soccer athletes. Eleven athletes completed two GXT protocols on separate days. Each GXT consisted of 2-min stages performed at a constant running speed and incremental increases of 2.5% grade. One GXT was performed continuously and the other was intermittent with 1-min active recovery between each stage. Tests were performed to volitional fatigue. Following the each GXT and a 10-min active recovery period, participants performed a verification stage at an intensity greater than the final stage of the GXT. All participants completed a higher intensity stage during the intermittent vs continuous GXT. As a result, VO2max and maximum heart rate (HR) were significantly higher (VO2: 57.7 ± 5.8 vs. 55.5 ± 5.7 ml•kg-1•min-1, HR: 190 ± 6 vs. 187 ± 6 bpm, p < 0.02) during the intermittent GXT. Maximum ventilation and respiratory exchange ratio did not differ between intermittent and continuous protocols. Following the intermittent GXT, nine participants completed the verification stage and obtained VO2 values within the plateau criterion. We conclude that a continuous GXT underestimates VO2max in some athletes and that the intermittent protocol may provide a more accurate measure of VO2max.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70252/ayzm8325

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Mier, C., & Alexander, R.
Venue
International Journal of Exercise Science
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
185-191
ISSN
1939-795X
Cited by
4
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intermittent vs Continuous Graded Exercise Test for VO2max in College Soccer Athletes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.70252/ayzm8325
The paper
Mier, C., & Alexander, R. (2011). Intermittent vs Continuous Graded Exercise Test for VO2max in College Soccer Athletes. International Journal of Exercise Science. https://doi.org/10.70252/ayzm8325