The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retaining K-12 Online Teachers: A Predictive Model for K-12 Online Teacher Turnover
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure and explore factors influencing K-12 online teachers’ turnover intentions, with job satisfaction and organizational commitment serving as moderating variables. Using Fishbein and Ajzen’s Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior (1975), this study was conducted in public, private, charter, for-profit, and not-for-profit K-12 online schools in a single Southeastern state. Using a quantitative survey design, the study included responses from 108 participants. The results revealed that K-12 online teachers intend to remain teaching in the online setting in the immediate, intermediate, and long-term future. A logistic regression model indicated schedule flexibility, mentoring, number of students, number of years teaching experience, and affective commitment are predictors of online teacher’s likelihood of turnover. These results inform K-12 online school leaders who seek to retain new hires of statistically significant variables that influence online teacher retention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A study conducted in the US found that affective organisational commitment is a key significant negative predictor of online K-12 teachers' probability of turnover (Larkin, Lokey-Vega, & Brantley-Dias, 2018).”
From Principals' digital transformational leadership, teachers' commitment, and school effectiveness (2025) · cites this paper as Larkin, Lokey-Vega, & Brantley-Dias, 2018
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · Cited by 11,917
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
(1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,439
The measurement of organizational commitment
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 · Cited by 8,911
Toward a definition of mixed methods research
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689806298224 · Cited by 6,464
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 · Cited by 6,458
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,439
(2009) · Cited by 6,311
TETT, R. P., & MEYER, J. P. (1993) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x · Cited by 4,114
Dunnette, M. D., & Herzberg, F. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391218 · Cited by 3,170
Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process.
Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493 · Cited by 2,251
Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism.
Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0034829 · Cited by 2,069
An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover.
Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.408 · Cited by 1,772
Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review of the Research
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308321455 · Cited by 1,429
Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control.
Price, J. L., & Mobley, W. H. (1983) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2523037 · Cited by 1,259
A Unified Model of Turnover from Organizations
Bluedorn, A. C. (1982) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678203500204 · Cited by 919
Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model.
Michaels, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.53 · Cited by 859
Ogba, I. (2008) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170810913051 · Cited by 761
Absenteeism and Turnover of Hospital Employees
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 593
Quantitative research methods for professionals
Vogt, W. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 461
LASCHINGER, H. K. S. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01293.x · Cited by 344
Exemplary Teacher Induction: An international review
Howe, E. R. (2006) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00195.x · Cited by 337
The Challenge of Staffing Our Schools.
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2001) · Educational leadership · Cited by 287
Personnel Attitudes and Motivation
Locke, E. A. (1975) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.26.020175.002325 · Cited by 280
Houkes, I., Janssen, P. P. M., JONGE, J. D., & Bakker, A. B. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903322591578 · Cited by 269
Why Do They Stay? Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of Job Satisfaction and Retention
Perrachione, B. A., Rosser, V. J., Petersen, G. J., & Obispo, S. L. (2008) · Cited by 258
An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader–member exchange and intent to turnover
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Witt, L. A. (2005) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.314 · Cited by 232
THE THREE-STAGE MODEL OF VOLUNTEERS' DURATION OF SERVICE
Chacón, F., Jiménez, M. L. V., & de León, M. C. D. (2007) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2007.35.5.627 · Cited by 212
Shea, P. (2007) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v11i2.1728 · Cited by 156
Oh, won’t you stay? Predictors of faculty intent to leave a public research university
Ryan, J. F., Healy, R., & Sullivan, J. M. (2011) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9448-5 · Cited by 142
Cohen, A. G. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056003011 · Cited by 135
Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. (2009) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.683 · Cited by 131
Organizational Commitment in the Military: Application of a Profile Approach
Meyer, J. P., Kam, C. C. S., Goldenberg, I., & Bremner, N. L. (2013) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1037/mil0000007 · Cited by 111
Larkin, I. M., Brantley‐Dias, L., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2016) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v20i3.986 · Cited by 97
Self-citationKazemi, E., Shapiro, M., & Kavner, A. (2015) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.06.012 · Cited by 86
Sturges, J., & Guest, D. E. (2001) · British Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069880127016 · Cited by 77
Holes in the Teacher Supply Bucket.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 60
Finster, M. (2013) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington) · Cited by 11
Şirin, H. D., & Şirin, E. F. (2013) · International Journal of Academic Research · doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-3/b.27 · Cited by 9
Seeking Alternatives to Inservice Technology Workshops from Teachers’ Perspectives
Sugar, W. A., & Wilson, K. L. (2005) · Journal of Computing in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10402454.2005.10784525 · Cited by 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of learner-, instructor-, and course-level factors on online learning
Zheng, B., Lin, C., & Kwon, J. B. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103851 · Cited by 118
First and Second Order Barriers to Teaching in K-12 Online Learning
Tawfik, A. A., Shepherd, C. E., Gatewood, J. D., & Gish-Lieberman, J. J. (2021) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-021-00648-y · Cited by 80
Principals' digital transformational leadership, teachers' commitment, and school effectiveness
Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2025) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705 · Cited by 51
Lin, H., Lin, J., Chen, C.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Bing-sen, L., & Lin, T. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9111569 · Cited by 25
Wu, C., Lin, H., Lai, S.-Y., Tseng, K.-C., & Hsu, C.-H. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9060713 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Larkin, I., Lokey-Vega, A., & Brantley-Dias, L.
- Affiliations
- Kennesaw State University (US)
- Kennesaw State University
- ORCID
- Lokey-Vega, Anissa
- Venue
- Journal of Online Learning Research
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-85
- ISSN
- 2374-1473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804541141
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Online Learning Research (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Online Learning Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
- Keywords
- teacher turnover, teacher retention, online schools, turnover intention, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, affective commitment, schedule flexibility, mentoring, teaching experience, theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
