CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation and Communication StudiesEducation and Technology Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher Educator Technology Integration Initiative: Addressing the Technology Preparation Gap

Dillon, Deborah, Chang, Yeng, Rondeau, Amanda, Kim, Justine·2019·Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
DOI 10.70725/753285dcstnh
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article documents how our college sought to address a technology integration preparation gap, with the implementation of the Teacher Educator Technology Integration initiative. We draw upon findings from an external program review that was commissioned to evaluate the initiative, including the type of support provided to teacher educators and how their participation in the initiative changed their technology integration practices based on the TETCs. This article outlines how our college came to identify the need for the Initiative, describes the frameworks and structures of the Initiative’s pilot year with four discipline area licensure programs, and details adjustments made to continuously improve the professional development experiences designed during the pilot. In our findings section, we describe three components of the Initiative that were responsible for teacher educators’ successful learning: (1) developing trusting relationships through coaching; (2) the use of situated learning that incorporated key strategies that were found to be effective in the literature; and (3) technology integration professional development focused on developing mindsets and skillsets. In addition to these three components, we determined that it was critical for college leadership to build a scale up timeline and a sustainability plan alongside the professional development work to ensure the Initiative’s success.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70725/753285dcstnh

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dillon, D., Chang, Y., Rondeau, A., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
Publisher
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
Published
2019
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
527-554
ISSN
1059-7069 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.70725/753285dcstnh
OpenAlex
W3027809097
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
technology integration, teacher educators, teacher educator professional development, coaching, situated learning, sustainability planning, college leadership, teacher education curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review