Cited by 5,047Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesEvaluation of Teaching Practices

What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers

Garet, Michael S., Porter, Andrew C, Desimone, Laura, Birman, Beatrice F, Yoon, Kwang Suk·2001·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

This study uses a national probability sample of 1,027 mathematics and science teachers to provide the first large-scale empirical comparison of effects of different characteristics of professional development on teachers’ learning. Results, based on ordinary least squares regression, indicate three core features of professional development activities that have significant, positive effects on teachers’ self-reported increases in knowledge and skills and changes in classroom practice: (a) focus on content knowledge; (b) opportunities for active learning; and (c) coherence with other learning activities. It is primarily through these core features that the following structural features significantly affect teacher learning: (a) the form of the activity (e.g., workshop vs. study group); (b) collective participation of teachers from the same school, grade, or subject; and (c) the duration of the activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00028312038004915

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observation and feedback cycles are most effective when frequent, in-depth, and sustained over long periods.

    “This finding is particular concerning given clear evidence that observation and feedback cycles are most effective when they are frequent, in-depth, and sustained over long periods of time (Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Yoon, 2001; Yoon, Duncan, Lee, Scarloss, & Shapley, 2007).”

    From Can Principals Promote Teacher Development as Evaluators? A Case Study of Principals’ Views and Experiences (2016) · cites this paper as Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Yoon, 2001

  • Data teams include other features of effective professional development.

    “In addition, data teams incorporate other characteristics of effective professional development”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Yoon, 2001

  • Not all opportunities result in teacher change and very few result in students achieving the required outcomes.

    “However, not all opportunities result in teacher change and very few result in students' achieving the required outcomes (Garet et al. 2001).”
  • Few studies have examined which training elements are critical for successful teacher training on prevention program fidelity and quality, and little professional development research links teacher development to student outcomes.

    “There have not been many studies that have specifically studied what elements of training are critical to successful teacher training regarding prevention program fidelity and quality, although there is a body of literature on professional development in general, there is little that focus on professional development of teachers as it relates to student outcomes (Garet et al. 2001).”
  • Garet and colleagues also found that coherence-helping teachers see how the curriculum fits the school's mission-matters.

    “Garet and colleagues also found that helping teachers understand how the curriculum fits into the school’s mission (i.e., coherence) is important.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S.
Affiliations
  • American Institutes for Research (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2001-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
915-945
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W2137524155
Cited by
5,047
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 206 · 2021: 259 · 2020: 309 · 2019: 332 · 2018: 255 · 2017: 314 · 2016: 344 · 2015: 361 · 2014: 289 · 2013: 305 · 2012: 287
FWCI
211.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
teacher professional development, teacher learning, mathematics teachers, science teachers, content knowledge, active learning, peer collaboration, classroom practice change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review