Cited by 146Animal Law and WelfareAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal and Plant Science Education

Students’ attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia

Phillips, CJC, Izmirli, S, Aldavood, SJ, Alonso, M, Choe, Bl, Hanlon, A, Handziska, A, Illmann, G +7 more·2012·Animal Welfare

Abstract

A survey of attitudes towards the welfare and rights of animals was conducted in universities in 11 European and Asian countries, to improve understanding of cultural differences that might impact on trade and international relations. Collaborators’ universities were recruited in each country to assist in the design, translation and administration of the survey via the internet in a convenient selection of the country's universities, providing 3,433 student responses from at least 103 universities. Respondents rated the acceptability of 43 major concerns about animals (focused on type of use, animal integrity, killing animals, animal welfare, experimentation on animals, changes in animal genotypes, the environment for animals and societal attitudes towards animals). Students from European countries had more concern for animal welfare than students from Asian countries, which may be partly explained by increased affluence of European students as there was a positive correlation between student expenditure and concern for animal welfare and rights. Southern and central European countries had most concern for animal rights and unnatural practices. Those in communist or former communist countries in Asia and Europe had most concern about killing animals and those in northern European countries the least. Regional similarities between neighbouring countries were evident in responses to animal issues and there were no differences between ethnic groups within a country. Thus, there…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7120/096272812799129466

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A social movement has led to increased public concern and interest in the welfare of animals in captivity.

    “Although personal and community views vary worldwide, it is well recognized that there is a social movement emerging that has led to increased public concern and interest in the welfare of animals in captivity [1,2,3,4,5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, S., Alonso, M., Choe, B., Hanlon, A., Handziska, A., Illmann, G., Keeling, L., Kennedy, M., Lee, G., Lund, V, Mejdell, C., Pelagic, V., & Rehn, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Universidad de León (ES)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Institute of Animal Science (CZ)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NO)
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2012-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
87-100
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W1972627759
Cited by
146
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
69.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • University of Queensland
  • Ministerstvo Zemědělství
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
Keywords
animal rights, university students, cross-cultural comparison, Europe, Asia, animal experimentation, killing of animals, animal use, regional variation, communist countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review