Cited by 56Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsReproductive Health and ContraceptionBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery in Japanese Women

Open access
Yokoi, Akira, Ishikawa, Kaoru, Miyazaki, Ken, Yoshida, Kana, Furuhashi, Madoka, Tamakoshi, Koji·2012·International Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

AIM: To validate a previously developed prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) using a Japanese cohort. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of all term pregnant women with a vertex position, singleton gestation, and one prior low transverse cesarean delivery attempting a trial of labor between April 1985 and March 2010. Variables necessary for the prediction of successful VBAC were maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, ethnicity, prior vaginal delivery, prior VBAC, and indication for prior cesarean delivery. They were extracted from medical records and put into the formula that calculates an individual woman's predicted VBAC success rate. The predicted rates were then partitioned into deciles and compared with the actual VBAC rates. The predictive ability of the model was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-five women who met the inclusion criteria had complete data available, of which 664 (91.6%) had VBAC. The predicted probability of VBAC, as calculated by the regression equation, was significantly higher in those who had a successful trial of labor (median 80.1%, interquartile range 71.5-88.7) than those who did not (median 69.4%, interquartile range 59.9-78.9, P<0.001). The predictive model had AUC of 0.80, which was comparative to the originally described one. When the predicted rates were each deciles of over 70%, the actual success rates were more than 90%. CONCLUSION: The previously published prediction model for VBAC developed in the USA is also available to Japanese women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/ijms.4682

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The success rate for spontaneous vaginal delivery after a trial of labor in women with a previous cesarean section is 60-80%.

    “the success rate for spontaneous vaginal delivery is 60–80%.”

    From Preference and determinants of delivery mode in pregnant women with one cesarean scar: a cross-sectional study in two urban Ugandan public hospitals (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results report a 91.5% success rate among the 725 Japanese women who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean, contrary to the attributed 60–80% rate. The Discussion contrasts that result with reported US rates of 52.2–74.4%, rather than stating a general 60–80% rate. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Martin JA Hamilton BE Sutton PD Ventura SJ Mathews TJ Osterman MJK Births: final data for 2008 Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010 59 1 72 22145497
  2. [2]Niino Y The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it Biosci Trends 2011 5 139 150 21914948
  3. [3]Lumbiganon P Laopaiboon M Glümezoglu AM Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08 Lancet 2010 375 490 499 20071021
  4. [5]Andrews D Humphries G After a cesarean…What's a birth professionals to do? J Perinat Educ 2010 19 11 15 21358830 PMC2866434
  5. [6]Clark EA Silver RM Long-term maternal mormidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 205 S2 10 22114995
  6. [7]Gurol-Urganci L Cromwell DA Edozien LC Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011 11 95 22103697 PMC3247856
  7. [8]National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights March 8-10, 2010 Obstet Gynecol 2010 115 1279 1295 20502301
  8. [9]ACOG Practice bulletin no 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol 2010 116 450 463 20664418
  9. [10]Grobman WA Lai Y Landon MB Development of a Nomogram for Prediction of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Obstet Gynecol 2007 109 806 812 17400840
  10. [11]Hanley JA McNeil BJ The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 1982 143 29 36 7063747
  11. [12]Constantine MM Fox K Byers BD Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol 2009 114 1029 1033 20168103
  12. [13]Mamun AA Callaway LK O'Callaghan MJ Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and excess pregnancy weight gains with adverse pregnancy outcomes and length of hospital stay BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011 11 62 21892967 PMC3178538
  13. [14]Grobman WA Lai Y Landon MB The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011 25 37 43 21133967 PMC3066476
  14. [15]Wen SW Rusen ID Walker M Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 191 1263 1269 15507951
  15. [16]McMahon MJ Luther ER Bowes WA Jr Olshan AF Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section N Engl J Med 1996 335 689 695 8703167
  16. [17]Sieck CC Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma J Okla State Med Assoc 1997 90 444 449 9816391
  17. [18]Lyerly AD Little MO Toward an ethically responsible approach to vaginal birth after cerasean Semin Perinatol 2010 34 337 344 20869550 PMC2946940

Metadata

Authors
Yokoi, A., Ishikawa, K., Miyazaki, K., Yoshida, K., Furuhashi, M., & Tamakoshi, K.
Affiliations
  • Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yokoi, Akira
Venue
International Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2012
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
488-491
ISSN
1449-1907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130131848
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
vaginal birth after cesarean, trial of labor, model validation, Japanese women, cesarean section, prior vaginal delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, maternal age, prediction accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Pregnancy, Trial of Labor, Vaginal Birth after Cesarean, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review