Cited by 70Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Transcranial blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease patients using a portable focused ultrasound system with real-time 2-D cavitation mapping

Open access
Bae, Sua, Liu, Keyu, Pouliopoulos, Antonios N., Ji, Robin, Jiménez-Gambín, Sergio, Yousefian, Omid, Kline-Schoder, Alina R., Batts, Alec J. +5 more·2024·Theranostics

Abstract

Abstract Background Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has recently shown great promise in facilitating blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening for drug delivery and immunotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, it is currently limited to systems integrated within the MRI suites or requiring post-surgical implants, thus restricting its widespread clinical adoption. In this pilot study, we investigate the clinical safety and feasibility of a portable, non-invasive neuronavigation-guided FUS (NgFUS) system with integrated real-time 2-D microbubble cavitation mapping. Methods A phase 1 clinical study with mild to moderate AD patients (N=6) underwent a single session of microbubble-mediated NgFUS to induce transient BBB opening (BBBO). Microbubble activity under FUS was monitored with real-time 2-D cavitation maps and dosing to ensure the efficacy and safety of the NgFUS treatment. Post-operative MRI was used for BBB opening and closure confirmation as well as safety assessment. Changes in AD biomarker levels in both blood serum and extracellular vesicles (EVs) were evaluated, while changes in amyloid-beta (Aβ) load in the brain were assessed through 18 F-Florbetapir PET. Results BBBO was achieved in 5 out of 6 subjects with an average volume of 983±626 mm 3 following FUS at the right frontal lobe both in white and gray matter regions. The outpatient treatment was completed within 34.8±10.7 min. Cavitation dose significantly correlated with the BBBO volume ( R 2 >0.9, N =4), demonstrating the portable NgFUS system’s capability of predicting opening volumes. The cavitation maps co-localized closely with the BBBO location, representing the first report of real-time transcranial 2-D cavitation mapping in the human brain. Larger opening volumes correlated with increased levels of AD biomarkers, including Aβ42 ( R 2 =0.74), Tau ( R 2 =0.95), and P-Tau181 ( R 2 =0.86), assayed in serum-derived EVs sampled 3 days after FUS ( N =5). From PET scans, subjects showed a lower Aβ load increase in the treated frontal lobe region compared to the contralateral region. Reduction in asymmetry standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) correlated with the cavitation dose ( R 2 >0.9, N =3). Clinical changes in the mini-mental state examination over 6 months were within the expected range of cognitive decline with no additional changes observed as a result of FUS. Conclusion We showed the safety and feasibility of this cost-effective and time-efficient portable NgFUS treatment for BBBO in AD patients with the first demonstration of real-time 2-D cavitation mapping. The cavitation dose correlated with BBBO volume, a slowed increase in pathology, and serum detection of AD proteins. Our study highlights the potential for accessible FUS treatment in AD, with or without drug delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/thno.94206

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bae, S., Liu, K., Pouliopoulos, A. N., Ji, R., Jiménez-Gambín, S., Yousefian, O., Kline-Schoder, A. R., Batts, A. J., Tsitsos, F. N., Kokossis, D., Mintz, A., Honig, L. S., & Konofagou, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Konofagou, Elisa E.
Venue
Theranostics
Published
2024
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
4519-4535
ISSN
1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401370066
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 7
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Theranostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Focused Ultrasound Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG038961, P30AG066462)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB029338)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, blood-brain barrier opening, focused ultrasound, microbubbles, portable ultrasound, extracellular vesicles, amyloid-beta, tau protein, 18F-florbetapir PET, brain drug delivery, transcranial ultrasound

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review