Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Courage and Thoughtful Scholarship = Indigenous Archaeology Partnerships

Croes, Dale R.·2010·American Antiquity

Abstract

Robert McGhee's recent lead-in American Antiquity article entitled Aboriginalism and Problems of Indigenous archaeology seems to emphasize the pitfalls that can occur in “indigenous archaeology.” Though the effort is never easy, I would emphasize an approach based on a 50/50 partnership between the archaeological scientist and the native people whose past we are attempting to study through our field and research techniques. In northwestern North America, we have found this approach important in sharing ownership of the scientist/tribal effort, and, equally important, in adding highly significant (scientifically) cultural knowledge of Tribal members through their ongoing cultural transmission—a concept basic to our explanation in the field of archaeology and anthropology. Our work with ancient basketry and other wood and fiber artifacts from waterlogged Northwest Coast sites demonstrates millennia of cultural continuity, often including regionally distinctive, highly guarded cultural styles or techniques that tribal members continue to use. A 50/50 partnership means, and allows, joint ownership that can only expand the scientific description and the cultural explanation through an Indigenous archaeology approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge.

    “Contrary to critiques about the rigor of Indigenous archaeologies as social projects that do not contribute to academic knowledge production (e.g., McGhee 2008McGhee , 2010)), a growing body of scholarship has demonstrated how research based in community values and knowledge can drive and enrich the production of both community and academic knowledge (e.g., Cipolla et al. 2019;Croes 2010;Gonzalez”

    From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Croes 2010

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1017/S0003598X00085355 · DOI
  2. Nicholas, 1997, At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, 1
  3. 10.1179/jwa.2002.2.1.25 · DOI
  4. Foster, 2007, Seeking Our Past. An Introduction to North American Archaeology, 224
  5. Croes, 1999, Bog Bodies, Sacred Sites and Wetland Archaeology, 59
  6. Croes, 1995, The Hoko River Archaeological Site Complex, the Wet/Dry Site (45CA213), 3,000-2,600 B.P
  7. Croes, 1977, Basketry from the Ozette Village Archaeological Site: A Technological Functional, and Comparative Study
  8. 10.1017/S0002731600047314 · DOI
  9. 10.1179/jwa.2005.5.1.141 · DOI
  10. 10.1179/jwa.2009.9.1.1 · DOI
  11. 10.1179/jwa.2004.4.1.125 · DOI
  12. Deloria, 1995, Red Earth, White Lies
  13. Croes, 2005, The Hoko River Archaeological Site Complex, the Rockshelter (45CA21), 1,000-100 B.P, Olympic Peninsula, Washington
  14. Croes, 2001, Perspectives on Northern Northwest Coast Prehistory, 145, 10.2307/j.ctt22zmcv8.10 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Croes, D. R.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
2010-04
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
211-216
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review