Cited by 20Health and Medical Research ImpactsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceEthics in Clinical Research

Does South Africa need a national clinical trials support unit?

Open access
Siegfried, N, Volmink, J, Dhansay, A·2010·South African Medical Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No national South African institution provides a coherent suite of support, available skills and training for clinicians wishing to conduct randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the public sector. We report on a study to assess the need for establishing a national South African Clinical Trials Support Unit. OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for additional training and support for conduct of RCTs within South African institutions; identify challenges facing institutions conducting RCTs; and provide recommendations for enhancing trial conduct within South African public institutions. DESIGN: Key informant interviews of senior decision-makers at institutions with a stake in the South African public sector clinical trials research environment. RESULTS: Trial conduct in South Africa faces many challenges, including lack of dedicated funding, the burden on clinical load, and lengthy approval processes. Strengths include the high burden of disease and the prevalence of treatment-naïve patients. Participants expressed a significant need for a national initiative to support and enhance the conduct of public sector RCTs. Research methods training and statistical support were viewed as key. There was a broad range of views regarding the structure and focus of such an initiative, but there was agreement that the national government should provide specific funding for this purpose. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders generally support the establishment of a national clinical trials support initiative. Consideration must be given to the sustainability of such an initiative, in terms of funding, staffing, expected research outputs and permanence of location.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7196/samj.3958

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles.

    “Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles [40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52].”
  • Many articles reported that lack of time and other competing priorities related to competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities was an issue.

    “Many articles reported that lack of time [40, 48, 51, 53] and other competing priorities related to the competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities [40, 43, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53] was an issue.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Benatar S, Vaughan C. Global and local forces shaping the research agenda and the governance of research ethics. South African Journal of Science 2008; 104: 439-442.
  2. Enabling research in developing countries (editorial). Lancet 2000; 356: 1043.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegfried, N., Volmink, J., & Dhansay, A.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Venue
South African Medical Journal
Published
2010-07-26
Volume
100
Issue
8
Pages
521
ISSN
  • 0256-9574 (ISSN-L)
  • 2078-5135
OpenAlex
W2147878916
Cited by
20
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • South African Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Cape Town
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
randomized controlled trials, research capacity building, research training, research funding, research infrastructure, South Africa
MeSH terms
Financing, Government, Interviews as Topic, Research Personnel, South Africa, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review