Does South Africa need a national clinical trials support unit?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: No national South African institution provides a coherent suite of support, available skills and training for clinicians wishing to conduct randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the public sector. We report on a study to assess the need for establishing a national South African Clinical Trials Support Unit. OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for additional training and support for conduct of RCTs within South African institutions; identify challenges facing institutions conducting RCTs; and provide recommendations for enhancing trial conduct within South African public institutions. DESIGN: Key informant interviews of senior decision-makers at institutions with a stake in the South African public sector clinical trials research environment. RESULTS: Trial conduct in South Africa faces many challenges, including lack of dedicated funding, the burden on clinical load, and lengthy approval processes. Strengths include the high burden of disease and the prevalence of treatment-naïve patients. Participants expressed a significant need for a national initiative to support and enhance the conduct of public sector RCTs. Research methods training and statistical support were viewed as key. There was a broad range of views regarding the structure and focus of such an initiative, but there was agreement that the national government should provide specific funding for this purpose. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders generally support the establishment of a national clinical trials support initiative. Consideration must be given to the sustainability of such an initiative, in terms of funding, staffing, expected research outputs and permanence of location.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles.
“Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles [40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52].”
From Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—A systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [46]
Many articles reported that lack of time and other competing priorities related to competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities was an issue.
“Many articles reported that lack of time [40, 48, 51, 53] and other competing priorities related to the competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities [40, 43, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53] was an issue.”
From Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—A systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109 · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42 · Cited by 2,336 · see citing works
Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research
Britten, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
Brain drain and health professionals
Pang, T. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7336.499 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
North-South research partnerships: the ethics of carrying out research in developing countries
Edejer, T. T.-T. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7207.438 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Langer, A., Díaz-Olavarrieta, C., Berdichevsky, K., & Villar, J. (2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.1590/s0042-96862004001000022 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Unbiased research and the human spirit: the challenges of randomized controlled trials.
Schulz, K. F. (1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Science councils in South Africa
Scholes, R. J., Anderson, F., Kenyon, C. R., et al. (2008) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.1590/s0038-23532008000600014 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Clinical research in South Africa: a core asset under pressure
Gevers, W. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61119-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Gluud, C. N., & Ti, S. (1995) · Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.1995.tb00297.x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Fifty years of randomised controlled trials
British Medical Journal Publishing Group (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.0 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Siegfried, N., Clarke, M. J., Volmink, J. A., & van der Merwe, L. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003491 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationPharmacologically active: clinical trials and the pharmaceutical industry.
Kahn, M., & Gastrow, M. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Benatar S, Vaughan C. Global and local forces shaping the research agenda and the governance of research ethics. South African Journal of Science 2008; 104: 439-442.
- Enabling research in developing countries (editorial). Lancet 2000; 356: 1043.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—A systematic review
Alemayehu, C., Mitchell, G., & Nikles, J. (2018) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
“Many articles reported that lack of time [40, 48, 51, 53] and other competing priorities related to the competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities [40, 43, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53] was an issue.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Siegfried, N., Volmink, J., & Dhansay, A.
- Affiliations
- South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Venue
- South African Medical Journal
- Published
- 2010-07-26
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 521
- ISSN
- 0256-9574 (ISSN-L)
- 2078-5135
- OpenAlex
- W2147878916
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- South African Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Cape Town
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trials, research capacity building, research training, research funding, research infrastructure, South Africa
- MeSH terms
- Financing, Government, Interviews as Topic, Research Personnel, South Africa, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review