Post-Soviet structures, path-dependency and passivity in Chukotkan coastal villages
Abstract
Based on examples from Chukotka’s history, this article focuses on a comparison between the early Soviet period and the years following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, in order to analyse points of distinction and surprising similarities between the two periods. This article compares the events of the two periods and uses the concept of “path-dependency” as an analytical tool to explain the discrepancy between statements of democracy/market-economy and the continued Soviet way of thinking in order to examine the widespread state of powerlessness and passivity among Chukotka’s Indigenous population and the inertia of progression in the bureaucratic system. The article also highlights the importance of the Indigenous elite. In the early years of the Soviet era, the elite underwent suppression and subjugation, which among other things led to an incipient powerlessness and passivity among the Indigenous people in Chukotka. During the past few decades, new up-coming Eskimo (Yupik) and Chukchi elites have begun to launch a number of embryonic initiatives with a non-Soviet origin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Industrialization in Chukotka became a means to increase state use of marine mammals, particularly for commercial fur production.
“Industrialization in Chukotka became a means to increase state use of marine mammals (gray and bowhead whales, walrus, and seals), particularly for commercial fur production (Nielsen, 2007).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Nielsen, 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nielsen, B.
- Affiliations
- Danish Arctic Institute (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Nielsen, Bent
- Venue
- Études/Inuit/Studies
- Publisher
- Consortium Erudit
- Published
- 2009-01-20
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 163-181
- ISSN
- 0701-1008 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-5268
- OpenAlex
- W2169756096
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Études/Inuit/Studies (publishedVersion)
- Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Soviet and Russian History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- post-Soviet transition, path dependence, indigenous peoples, Yup'ik, Chukchi, Chukotka, coastal villages, powerlessness, passivity, bureaucratic inertia, indigenous elites, Soviet legacy, democratization, market economy, state-society relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review