Cited by 1Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityHistorical and Linguistic Studies

The Virgin Birth of Jesus in the Talmudic Context

Jaffé, Dan·2013·Laval théologique et philosophique

Abstract

This article proposes a philological and historic analysis of the Talmudic name Ben Pantera. It is suggested that this ancient expression has to be understood as corresponding to a period in which the Jews wished to think of Christianity, choosing the person of Jesus as an emblematic figure of this reality. The expression Ben Pantera expresses mockery and even scorn towards Jesus. It must be placed back in a period in which, on account of the doctrinal controversies between Jews and Christians, the two religions had consummated a Parting of the Ways and acknowledged each other as rivals. Thus, Ben Pantera appears to be the oldest mention of Jesus in the Talmudic literature.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article argues that the Talmudic name *Ben Pantera* for Jesus is best understood as a Jewish mockery of the Christian belief in the virgin conception and birth, reflecting second-century Jewish–Christian rivalry. It concludes that *Ben Pantera* is the oldest reference to Jesus in Talmudic literature.

Key findings

  • The cognomen *yeshu(a) ben pantera* is interpreted as a derisive Jewish response to the Christian doctrine of Jesus’ virginal conception and birth, not as a neutral name.
  • The accusation that Jesus was illegitimate—born of Mary’s adultery with a Roman soldier named Pantera—appears in Jewish, pagan, and Christian sources, including Origen’s report of Celsus (c. 178 CE), Origen’s own mention around 248 CE, Tertullian, and later *Toledot Yeshu*.
  • Talmudic and midrashic texts equate Christianity with prostitution and seduction, as in *Abot de Rabbi Nathan* 2/a, where *minuth* (heresy) is linked to the harlot of Proverbs; this supports the claim that Christianity was seen as an archetype of temptation.
  • The article dates the emergence of *Ben Pantera* to the second century, the period of the “Parting of the Ways,” and states that it is “the most ancient reference to Jesus to be found in Talmudic literature.”

Methods

  • Philological and historical analysis of the Talmudic name *Ben Pantera* and related forms (*pantera*, *pandira*, *pandera*, *pantira*, *panteri*), focusing mainly on Tannaitic texts.
  • Survey and critique of earlier scholarly explanations by Laible, Krauss, Deissmann, Patterson, Kaminski, Eisler, Klausner, Lauterbach, Rokeah, Porton, Schäfer, and others.
  • Comparison of Talmudic and midrashic passages with patristic sources (Origen, *Contra Celsum* I:32; Tertullian; Epiphanius), Christian apocrypha (*Gospel of Thomas* 105; *Acts of Pilate* II:3; *Protevangelium of James*; *Ascension of Isaiah*; *Odes of Solomon* 19:6), and *Toledot Yeshu*.

Limitations

  • Stated: the exact meaning of the cryptogram *yeshu(a) ben pantera* remains “far from being obvious,” and no solution is regarded as definitive.
  • Stated: many earlier linguistic explanations rest on “conjectures without any true foundation” or “flimsy linguistic parallels”; the knowledge of Christian belief in the virginal conception among first-century Jews “has not been attested with certainty.”
  • Evident from the text: the dating of *Toledot Yeshu* is debated (fifth century per Krauss, fourth century per Horbury, generally tenth century but based on Amoraic traditions), and the article relies on textual interpretation rather than new manuscript discoveries.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1015256ar

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 9

    Celsus' tract was contemporaneous with the appearance of the Christian apocrypha exalting Mary's virginity.

    “It should be noted that Celsus' tract was contemporaneous with the appearance of the Christian apocrypha exalting Mary's virginity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Protevangelium of James 11:2-3

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ascension of Isaiah 11:5

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Odes of Solomon 19:6

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 8

    Origen mentions the accusation of adultery leveled against Mary around the year 248.

    “Origen mentions the accusation of adultery leveled against Mary around the year 248.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ORIGEN, Commentary on John 20:14

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 8

    Vestiges of the formula 'Ben Pantera' can be found in patristic literature.

    “Interestingly, vestiges of the formula 'Ben Pantera' can be found in patristic literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    The accusation of adultery/illegitimate birth was current for a long time among the Jews, as it is found in Toledot Yeshu.

    “The accusation was current for a long time among the Jews, for it is found in Toledot Yeshu .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Y. DEUTCH

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingnone given
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 11

    The mention 'Jesus son of Joseph' in the Gospels appears in this form only in Luke (4:22) and John (1:45; 6:42), i.e., only in the later Gospels.

    “Here it should be emphasized that the mention 'Jesus son of Joseph' in the Gospels appears in this form only in Luke (4:22) and John (1:45 ; 6:42), in other words, only in the later Gospels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Luke (4:22)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites John (1:45 ; 6:42)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    In the Vienna manuscript of Toledot Yeshu, Mary's husband is named Joseph Ben Pandera, while the impious man who instigated the adultery is named Yohanan.

    “The Vienna manuscript, entitled, 'History of the Mother and her Son,' recounts the only version in which Mary's husband is named Joseph Ben Pandera, whereas the impious man who instigated the adultery is named Yohanan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J.P. OSIER

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    In the Strasburg manuscripts, the Wagenseil and Huldreich versions of Toledot Yeshu, the names are inverted: Jesus' mother's husband is named Yohanan, and the adulterous partner is named Joseph Pandera (or Joseph ben Pandera in the Strasburg manuscript).

    “In the Strasburg manuscripts, the Wagenseil and Huldreich versions of Toledot Yeshu , the names are inverted : Jesus' mother's husband is named Yohanan, and the adulterous partner is named Joseph Pandera (or Joseph ben Pandera in the Strasburg manuscript).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J.P. OSIER

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    The name Pantera appears in Epiphanius, Adversus Haereses III, 78, 7, where he quotes Origen regarding Jacob, the father of Joseph and Jesus' grandfather; in that passage Jacob is given the name Πάνθηρ.

    “Most interestingly, the name Pantera appears in Epiphanius in Adversus Haereses III, 78, 7, where he quotes Origen regarding Jacob, the father of Joseph and Jesus' grandfather. In that passage Jacob is given the name of Πάνθηρ .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Epiphanius, Adversus Haereses, III, 78, 7

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 16

    Other occurrences of the verb form darash are found, and their authors are well known Sages.

    “Other occurrences of the verb form darash are found, and their authors are well known Sages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites BT Gittin 43a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites BT Pesahim 42a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ketubbot 49a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 15

    While these names are typical of rabbinical literature, yeshu hanotsri is mainly found in Babylonian sources.

    “While these names are typical of rabbinical literature, it should be noted that the latter is mainly found in Babylonian sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BT Sanhedrin 43a ; 107b ; BT Sotah 47a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 17

    Certain texts of the Tosefta mention the complete name of Ben Patouri(a), who appears to be R. Yehuda ben Paturi, a man who indeed lived in the second century.

    “Certain texts of the Tosefta mention the complete name of Ben Patouri(a), who appears to be R. Yehuda ben Paturi , a man who indeed lived in the second century.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites T Sotah V, 13 ; VI, 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    In the Christian world, the second century was the time of the great Dialogues and disputes with the Jews, including the lost Dialogue between Jason and Papiscos on Jesus, Justin of Neapolis' Dialogue with Tryphon, and Tertullian's Adversus Iudaeos.

    “In the Christian world, the second century was the time of the great Dialogues and disputes with the Jews, including the Dialogue between Jason and Papiscos on Jesus, unfortunately lost, the Dialogue with Tryphon of Justin of Neapolis or Tertullian's Adversus Iudaeos .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Justin of Neapolis

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Tertullian's Adversus Iudaeos

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Résumé de l'article · p. 1

    In Talmudic literature, Christianity is often assimilated to the seduction exerted by prostitution.

    “Le christianisme y est souvent assimilé à la séduction exercée par la prostitution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    The Talmudic polemic and that of Celsus regarding Mary's adultery and the illegitimate birth of Jesus are a counter-narrative to the Evangelists.

    “Moreover, his argument, which consists in reading the Talmudic polemic and that of Celsus regarding Mary's adultery and the illegitimate birth of Jesus as a counter-narrative to the Evangelists, is entirely pertinent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites P. SCHÄFER, Jesus in the Talmud, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 20-21.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    The meaning of the cryptogram yeshu(a) ben pantera is far from obvious; it probably changed over time according to the Jewish perception of Jesus.

    “So we have found that the meaning of the cryptogram, yeshu(a) ben pantera , is far from being obvious. It probably changed over time according to the Jewish perception of Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    The accusation of adultery is a challenge to belief in the virginal conception and to Jesus' status as the Messiah descended from David.

    “Thus Schäfer regards this accusation of adultery as a challenge to belief in the virginal conception, as a challenge to his status as the Messiah descended from David, a position that one can only accept without reservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ibid., p. 22

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 8

    The injurious remark regarding the virgin birth of Jesus does not appear to be of pagan origin; rather it is Jewish in origin and was probably widespread a few decades before Celsus made use of it.

    “However, this injurious remark regarding the virgin birth of Jesus does not appear to be of pagan origin. Rather it is Jewish in origin and was probably widespread a few decades before Celsus made use of it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ORIGEN, Contra Celsum I:32

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 11

    In John 6:42, the verse offers a supplementary element referring explicitly to Jesus' parents, who seemed to be known by the speakers; no arguments are employed to counter the affirmation of a natural birth of Jesus.

    “In John 6:42, the verse specifies : 'Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know ?' It thus offers a supplementary element referring explicitly to Jesus' parents, who moreover seemed to be known by the speakers. Therefore it can be emphasized that no arguments are employed to counter the affirmation of a natural birth of Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites John 6:42

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    The close similarity between the Talmudic words and those of Celsus regarding the name Pantera suggests a common source.

    “According to Peter Schäfer, the close similarity between the words in the Talmud and those of Celsus (as attested by Origen) regarding the name Pantera suggests a common source.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites P. SCHÄFER, Jesus in the Talmud, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 20-21.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    In Toledot Yeshu, the structural outline of the biography of Jesus in the Gospels is preserved while reshaped to produce a truncated version of the events; its remarks are based on Talmudic sources that have been thoroughly reworked, and it presents a Jewish life of Jesus.

    “In this work, the structural outline of the biography of Jesus in the Gospels is preserved, while it is reshaped to produce a truncated version of the events. The remarks in the book are based on Talmudic sources that have been thoroughly reworked. Toledot Yeshu is thus given over to a thorough revision of the stories in the Gospels, presenting it in the form of a Jewish life of Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites S. KRAUSS

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites W. HORBURY

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites H.J. SCHONFELD

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 9

    The tradition of Jesus' mother's adultery is also found in certain Christian apocrypha, showing that the accusation emerged around the beginning of the second century.

    “The tradition of Jesus' mother's adultery is also found in certain Christian apocrypha, showing that the accusation emerged around the beginning of the second century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gospel of Thomas 105

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Acts of Pilate II:3

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § THE VIRGIN BIRTH OF JESUS IN THE TALMUDIC CONTEXT A PHILOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS * · p. 2

    The expression Ben Pantera expresses mockery and even scorn towards Jesus.

    “The expression Ben Pantera expresses mockery and even scorn towards Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 9

    The insulting accusation of Mary's adultery was widespread among the Jews, and was probably transmitted to the pagans and finally found its way into the Christian apocrypha; hence it is probably quite a longstanding tradition.

    “These sources lead one to conjecture that the insulting accusation of Mary's adultery was widespread among the Jews, and that it was probably transmitted to the pagans and finally found its way into the Christian apocrypha. Hence it is probably quite a longstanding tradition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 5

    It is extremely difficult to imagine that the Sages would have employed a Greek term in Hebrew transliteration with the omission of certain letters; it is much more likely that they used their own phraseology for derisive purposes.

    “It is extremely difficult to imagine that the Sages would have employed a Greek term in Hebrew transliteration with the omission of certain letters. It is much more likely that they would have had recourse to their own phraseology, used for derisive purposes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    It is difficult to state why Jacob, Joseph's father and Jesus' grandfather, should have been called Πάνθηρ, and this instance sheds no new light on the origin of the cryptogram pantera.

    “Nevertheless, as Herford emphasizes, it is difficult to state why Jacob, Joseph's father and Jesus' grandfather should have been called Πάνθηρ . Moreover, this instance of its appearance sheds no new light on the origin of the cryptogram pantera .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites R.T. HERFORD

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    Knowledge of Christian belief in the virginal conception and birth among Jews in the late first century has not been attested with certainty; Rokeah's argument based solely on this is baseless.

    “Nevertheless it must be stated that knowledge of this Christian belief among the Jews in such an early period has not been attested with certainty. Since this scholar has based his argument on this sole element, it seems baseless to me.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    The epithet Ben Pantera became well known among Christians and pagans.

    “Moreover, the epithet also became well known among Christians and pagans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § I. THE STATE OF RESEARCH · p. 7

    In an early period the name Ben Pantera was first an oral tradition and was later transcribed in its different forms, first in ancient writings such as the Tosefta and following that in other texts.

    “It may well be that in an early period the name was first an oral tradition and that it was later transcribed, in its different forms, first in ancient writings such as the Tosefta and following that in other texts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites R. BAUCKHAM, Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church, Edinburgh, T&T Clark, 1990, p. 119.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 8

    The defamation attributed to Celsus regarding Jesus' mother predated the second century.

    “This passage permits us to assume that the defamation attributed to Celsus regarding Jesus' mother predated the second century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. CHRISTIAN SOURCES · p. 10

    In the Christian fight against pagan and Jewish slanders concerning the virgin birth of Jesus, two types of defense were established: taking up the accusation of adultery to counterattack its authors, and exalting Mary's virginity in second-century apocryphal texts to contest Celsus and his disciples.

    “If this assumption is retained, we would be in presence of two types of defense established in the Christian world in the fight against the pagan and Jewish slanders concerning the virgin birth of Jesus :”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The second-century apocryphal texts exalting Mary's virginity were a Christian response to Celsus' attacks.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 13

    The connection between Christianity and prostitution is to be understood as: prostitution represents the archetype of temptation; similarly, for the Sages Christianity represents the archetype of temptation; that temptation is regarded as absolutely subversive, hence the injunction to keep one's distance from it because it is very difficult to resist.

    “This connection is to be understood in the following manner : prostitution represents the archetype of temptation ; similarly, for the Sages Christianity represents the archetype of temptation. That temptation is regarded as absolutely subversive ; hence there is the injunction to keep one's distance from it, because it is very difficult to resist it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    The emergence of the name Ben Pantera must be situated in a spirit of combat but above all of rivalry.

    “Certainly the emergence of the name Ben Pantera must be situated in this spirit of combat but, above all, of rivalry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § III. A NEW PROPOSAL · p. 12

    The Jewish allegation that Jesus was the son of a prostitute is quite well grounded in the Talmudic tradition; it appears in both the Talmudic and Midrashic corpus and without doubt testifies to a very old Jewish representation of the person of Jesus.

    “The Jewish allegation that Jesus was the son of a prostitute is quite well grounded in the Talmudic tradition. It appears in both the Talmudic and Midrashic corpus and without doubt testifies to a very old Jewish representation of the person of Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sabbath 104b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites T. MURCIA

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites P. SCHÄFER

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    At that time, the doctrinal polemics between Jews and Christians caused the two religions to reach a Parting of the Ways and to regard one another as rivals.

    “At that time, the doctrinal polemics between Jews and Christians caused the two religions to reach a Parting of the Ways and to regard one another as rivals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 17

    A text of the Sifra, with content almost identical to that of the Baraita, mentions R. Aquiba in conversation with ben Patouri(a); this contemporary reference completely undermines the identification of the latter with Jesus.

    “A text of the Sifra, with content almost identical to that of the Baraita, mentions R. Aquiba in conversation with ben Patouri(a). Needless to say, this contemporary reference completely undermines the identification of the latter with Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sifra Behar Sinai, V

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    The Jewish world, well on its way to socioreligious normalization after the destruction of the Second Temple, wished to expel the Judeo-Christians from the Synagogue; the Birkat ha-minim constitutes the most significant step in this direction.

    “The Jewish world, that was well on its way to socioreligious normalization after the destruction of the Second Temple, wished to expel the Judeo-Christians from the Synagogue. The Birkat ha-minim constitutes the most significant step in this direction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites D. JAFFÉ

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 15

    Although relatively few in number, the Talmudic passages referring to Jesus are very explicit in their reference to Jesus.

    “Although relatively few in number, these passages are very explicit in their reference to Jesus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites R.T. HERFORD

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites H. STRACK

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 16

    The connection made by Lauterbach between the Baraita's teaching and the Sermon on the Mount, associating darash and drasha, is speculative and suffers from several difficulties that cast doubt upon its veracity.

    “Notwithstanding, this connection, which, to say the least, is speculative, suffers from several difficulties, which cast doubt upon its veracity :”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    The epithet 'Ben Pantera' is very old and corresponds to a historical period when the Jews wished to represent Christianity to themselves by choosing the person of Jesus as an emblematic figure of that religion.

    “We must conclude by saying that the epithet 'Ben Pantera' is very old and corresponds to a historical period when the Jews wished to represent Christianity to themselves by choosing the person of Jesus as an emblematic figure of that religion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 15

    Ben Pantera is the most ancient reference to Jesus to be found in Talmudic literature.

    “Thus, Ben Pantera is the most ancient reference to Jesus to be found in Talmudic literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 16

    The name yeshua ben Pantiri is usually thought to be a deformation of the form yeshua ben pant(d)era, which is supposed to be its original version.

    “Hence, the name is usually thought to be a deformation of the form, yeshua ben pant(d)era , which is supposed to be its original version.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § III. A NEW PROPOSAL · p. 12

    Tertullian's passage mentions the Jewish accusation of a union with a prostitute, of which Jesus was the product; this must have been a widespread allegation among the Jews, the very milieu in which Tertullian developed, and it confirms Origen's remarks in Contra Celsum.

    “This passage is particularly interesting, because it mentions the Jewish accusation of a union with a prostitute, of which Jesus was the product. This must have been a widespread allegation among the Jews, the very milieu in which Tertullian developed. Moreover, it confirms Origen's remarks in Contra Celsum .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites TERTULLIAN, De spectaculis, XXX, 6

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § EXCURSUS : YESHU BEN PANTIRI · p. 16

    It is unlikely that Jesus would have been named with the Hebrew term ben accompanied by the Latin patri.

    “It is unlikely that Jesus would have been named with the Hebrew term ben accompanied by the Latin patri .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 13

    The passage from Abot de Rabbi Nathan is crucial because it allows us to distinguish the attitude of the Sages toward the Christian minim.

    “This is a crucial text, because it allows us to distinguish the attitude of the Sages toward the Christian minim [heretics].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 14

    In the Christian world, the second century represented the concern for construction of an identity passing frequently by self-definition and apologetic steps aimed at informing Roman authorities of the existence and reality of Christianity.

    “In the Christian world this century represented the concern for construction of an identity passing frequently by self-definition (in order to dispute internally with personalities such as Basilides or Marcion) and apologetic steps aimed at informing the Roman authorities of the existence and reality of Christianity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites N. BELAYCHE

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites S.C. MIMOUNI

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § DAN JAFFÉ · p. 13

    The accusation that Jesus was the son of a prostitute is elaborated in the Midrash in the form of the affiliation between Jesus and Christianity; Christianity is equated with the seduction of a prostitute, from whom one must distance oneself radically.

    “The accusation that Jesus was the son of a prostitute is elaborated in the Midrash in the form of the affiliation between Jesus and Christianity. In other words, Christianity is equated with the seduction of a prostitute, from whom one must distance oneself radically, as we see in the following passage :”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abot de Rabbi Nathan 2/a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Yeshu(a) ben Pantera is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.

    “eshu(a) ben Pantera' is one of the names used in Talmudic literature to designate Jesus of Nazareth.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The second-century apocryphal texts exalting Mary's virginity were a Christian response to Celsus' attacks.

    “The fact that they were contemporary with Celsus' remarks may lead us to see in them a kind of Christian response to the pagan philosopher's attacks. If this assumption is retained, we would be in presence of two types of defense established in the Christian world in the fight against the pagan and Jewish slanders concerning the virgin birth of Jesus :”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Yeshua ben pantiri is a deformation of yeshua ben pantera, which was much better known in Talmudic texts as references to Jesus.

    “Nevertheless, it does seem logical to assume that yeshua ben pantiri is a deformation of yeshua ben pantera , which was much better known in Talmudic texts as references to Jesus.”
3 of 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaffé, D.
Affiliations
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Jaffé, Dan
Venue
Laval théologique et philosophique
Published
2013-05-01
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
577-592
ISSN
  • 0023-9054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1703-8804
OpenAlex
W2030819372
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Laval théologique et philosophique (publishedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and Linguistic Studies
Keywords
Talmud, Jewish-Christian relations, parting of the ways, Talmudic literature, early Christian apologetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review