Cited by 64Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PTSD Subclusters and Functional Impairment in Kosovo Peacekeepers

Abstract

Peacekeepers deployed to Kosovo (N = 203) were evaluated prospectively, before the mission (August 2000) and at postdeployment, on a number of mental health and functional impairment variables. We examined the association between PTSD symptom subclusters and three indicators of functional impairment using hierarchical regression analyses, controlling for PTSD symptoms before the mission, and history of prior trauma. In the first model, avoidance and hyperarousal symptoms uniquely predicted a conglomerate of functional impact outcomes (e.g., employment, family relationships, social functioning). In the second model, emotional numbing was the only significant predictor of violent behaviors. In the third model, re-experiencing symptoms were the only significant predictor of alcohol abuse problems. Overall, the four PTSD subclusters are differentially associated with varying functional impairment outcomes, which is important to note for evaluation and treatment purposes for veterans returning from overseas deployments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-03-2808

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Avoidance is considered to be a core maintaining and exacerbating factor in PTSD, and has demonstrated stronger associations with functional impairment than reexperiencing or numbing have.

    “This may be especially detrimental given that avoidance is considered to be a core maintaining and exacerbating factor in PTSD, and has demonstrated stronger associations with functional impairment than reexperiencing or numbing have (Maguen et al., 2009).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maguen, S., Stalnaker, M., McCaslin, S., & Litz, B. T.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2009-08
Volume
174
Issue
8
Pages
779-785
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2328580212
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, functional disability, peacekeepers, avoidance symptoms, hyperarousal symptoms, emotional numbing, re-experiencing symptoms, alcohol abuse, violent behavior, employment, family relationships, social functioning, military mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Military Personnel, Military Psychiatry, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Statistics as Topic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, United States, Warfare, Wounds and Injuries, Yugoslavia, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review