Cited by 2Systems Engineering Methodologies and ApplicationsAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The Integrated Blast Effects Sensor Suite: A Rapidly Developed, Complex, System of Systems

Liu, Brian, Medda, Alessio, Woods, Douglas, Phelps, Shean, Fain, Walter·2015·Military Medicine

Abstract

Spurned by the increasing concern and consciousness of traumatic brain injuries in deployed U.S. service members, the U.S. Army Rapid Equipping Force sought help from the Georgia Tech Research Institute to rapidly develop and deploy a system capable of gathering relevant soldier-centric data-the Integrated Blast Effects Sensor Suite. To meet aggressive program milestones and requirements, Georgia Tech Research Institute engaged in rapid systems engineering efforts focused on leveraging iterative development and test methodologies. Ultimately, an integrated system of systems composed of vehicle systems, soldier-worn headset and torso systems, and data retrieval systems was deployed to troops in Afghanistan for an operational assessment. The Integrated Blast Effects Sensor Suite development process and parallel efforts investigating injury dosimetry methodologies have yielded unique findings and lessons learned, which should be incorporated into future evolutions of similar systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-14-00455

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional benefits of wearable sensors in the field setting include their applicability in environments where rapid medical care is needed and often not readily available, for example, at the scene of accidents, in military settings, athletics and in resource-constrained environments.

    “Additional benefits of wearable sensors in the field setting include their applicability in environments where rapid medical care is needed and often not readily available, for example, at the scene of accidents, in military settings, athletics and in resource-constrained environments (Figure 2) [36,138-140].”

    From Wearables and the Medical Revolution (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, B., Medda, A., Woods, D., Phelps, S., & Fain, W.
Affiliations
Georgia Tech Research Institute (US)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2015-03
Volume
180
Issue
3S
Pages
195-200
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W1932203609
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
blast injury, traumatic brain injury, systems of systems, deployed soldiers, Afghanistan
MeSH terms
Blast Injuries, Brain Injuries, Explosions, Humans, Military Personnel, United States, Incidence, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review