The DOI matches its Crossref record.
R&D, Patents and Productivity
Abstract
An essential reference for specialists in the economics of technological change.--D. G. McFertridge, Canadian Journal of Economics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-t · Cited by 2,879
Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence
David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00087-6 · Cited by 1,634
Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183511.001.0001 · Cited by 1,370
Environmental Policy and Technological Change
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2002) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1015519401088 · Cited by 1,050
Measuring the Social Return to R&D
Jones, C. I., & Williams, J. C. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555856 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- Griliches, Z.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984
- OpenAlex
- W3123055224
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: R&D, Patents and Productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7208/chicago/9780226308920.001.0001
- The paper
- Griliches, Z. (1984). R&D, Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226308920.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
