Cited by 835Economic Growth and ProductivityFirm Innovation and GrowthInnovation Policy and R&D

Measuring the Social Return to R&D

Open access
Jones, C. I., Williams, J. C.·1998·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

A large empirical literature reports estimates of the rate of return to R&D ranging from 30% to over 100%, supporting the notion that there is too little private investment in research. This conclusion is challenged by the new growth theory. We derive analytically the relationship between the social rate of return to R&D and the coefficient estimates of the empirical literature. We show that these estimates represent a lower bound on the true social rate of return. Using a conservative estimate of the rate of return to R&D of about 30%, optimal R&D investment is at least four times larger than actual investment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/003355398555856

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saving and investment can promote growth if they flow into infrastructure, basic and applied research, and institutional improvements.

    “Saving and investment can also promote growth if they flow into infrastructure (Barro 1990, Canning & Pedroni 2008),basic and applied research ( Jones & Williams 1998, Prettner & Werner 2016, Huang et al. 2023), and institutional improvements (Acemoglu & Robinson 2010).”

    From Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences (2024) · cites this paper as Jones & Williams 1998

  • Technological progress is the main driver of long-run economic growth.

    “technological progress as the main driver of long-run economic growth”

    From Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences (2024) · cites this paper as Jones & Williams 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, C. I., & Williams, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
1998-11-01
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
1119-1135
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2046116978
Cited by
835
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
41.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Innovation Policy and R&D
Keywords
R&D investment, social rate of return, R&D productivity, economic growth models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review