Challenging Operations: Medical Reform and Resistance in Surgery
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the healthcare context, clinicians are expected to embrace a professional identity that includes always placing their patients first, over and above any personal commitments.
“with clinicians expected to embrace a professional identity that includes always 'placing their patients first, over and above any personal commitments' (Kellogg, 2011, p. 51).”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Kellogg, 2011
Identities centred on the service relationship may be 'expected' or idealized rather than the ones directly experienced by the professional.
“These findings bear relevance to work which highlights how identities centred on the service relationship may be 'expected' or idealized rather than the ones directly experienced by the professional (Kellogg, 2011;Reid, 2015).”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Kellogg, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 175
- Authors
- Kellogg, K. C.
- Corresponding author
- Kellogg, Katherine C.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W4206462082
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
