The Emotions of Protest
Abstract
In Donald Trump’s America, protesting has roared back into fashion. The Women’s March, held the day after Trump’s inauguration, may have been the largest in American history, and resonated around the world. Between Trump’s tweets and the march’s popularity, it is clear that displays of anger dominate American politics once again. There is an extensive body of research on protest, but the focus has mostly been on the calculating brain—a byproduct of structuralism and cognitive studies—and less on the feeling brain. James M. Jasper’s work changes that, as he pushes the boundaries of our present understanding of the social world. In The Emotions of Protest , Jasper lays out his argument, showing that it is impossible to separate cognition and emotion. At a minimum, he says, we cannot understand the Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street or pro- and anti-Trump rallies without first studying the fears and anger, moral outrage, and patterns of hate and love that their members feel. This is a book centered on protest, but Jasper also points toward broader paths of inquiry that have the power to transform the way social scientists picture social life and action. Through emotions, he says, we are embedded in a variety of environmental, bodily, social, moral, and temporal contexts, as we feel our way both consciously and unconsciously toward some things and away from others. Politics and collective action have always been a kind of laboratory for working out models of human action more genera…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jasper's analytical category distinguishes emotions by the durability of their cognitive processing and temporality: reflex emotions and needs have little cognitive processing and are fast automatic responses to events and information, while affective commitments and moral emotions have high cognitive processing, are more durable, and are constructed according to people's culture and biography.
“tenemos emociones con muy poco procesamiento cognitivo, respuestas automáticas bastante rápidas a eventos e información, como las emociones reflejo y las necesidades, y emociones con alto procesamiento cognitivo, como los compromisos afectivos y las emociones morales, más duraderas y que construyen en función de la cultura y la biografía de las personas (Jasper, 2018, p. 13).”
From "Orgull, ressentiment i menyspreu". Emociones y reglas del sentir para comprender el proceso de polarización en Catalunya (2024) · cites this paper as Jasper, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gravante, T., & Poma, A. (2024) · Quaderns de l'Institut Català d'Antropologia · doi:10.56247/qua.492
- Authors
- Jasper, J. M.
- Corresponding author
- Jasper, James M.
- ORCID
- Jasper, James M.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2761790683
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- protest, emotions, emotion and cognition, collective action, emotions in politics, anger, moral outrage, fear, Donald Trump, Tea Party movement, Occupy Wall Street
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review