Cited by 34Social Movements and Cultural IdentityHistory of Emotions ResearchPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

The Emotions of Protest

Jasper, James M.·2018·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Abstract

In Donald Trump’s America, protesting has roared back into fashion. The Women’s March, held the day after Trump’s inauguration, may have been the largest in American history, and resonated around the world. Between Trump’s tweets and the march’s popularity, it is clear that displays of anger dominate American politics once again. There is an extensive body of research on protest, but the focus has mostly been on the calculating brain—a byproduct of structuralism and cognitive studies—and less on the feeling brain. James M. Jasper’s work changes that, as he pushes the boundaries of our present understanding of the social world. In The Emotions of Protest , Jasper lays out his argument, showing that it is impossible to separate cognition and emotion. At a minimum, he says, we cannot understand the Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street or pro- and anti-Trump rallies without first studying the fears and anger, moral outrage, and patterns of hate and love that their members feel. This is a book centered on protest, but Jasper also points toward broader paths of inquiry that have the power to transform the way social scientists picture social life and action. Through emotions, he says, we are embedded in a variety of environmental, bodily, social, moral, and temporal contexts, as we feel our way both consciously and unconsciously toward some things and away from others. Politics and collective action have always been a kind of laboratory for working out models of human action more genera…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226561813.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jasper's analytical category distinguishes emotions by the durability of their cognitive processing and temporality: reflex emotions and needs have little cognitive processing and are fast automatic responses to events and information, while affective commitments and moral emotions have high cognitive processing, are more durable, and are constructed according to people's culture and biography.

    “tenemos emociones con muy poco procesamiento cognitivo, respuestas automáticas bastante rápidas a eventos e información, como las emociones reflejo y las necesidades, y emociones con alto procesamiento cognitivo, como los compromisos afectivos y las emociones morales, más duraderas y que construyen en función de la cultura y la biografía de las personas (Jasper, 2018, p. 13).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jasper, J. M.
Corresponding author
Jasper, James M.
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2018
OpenAlex
W2761790683
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.92
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
protest, emotions, emotion and cognition, collective action, emotions in politics, anger, moral outrage, fear, Donald Trump, Tea Party movement, Occupy Wall Street

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review