Cited by 68Chinese history and philosophyTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesIndian and Buddhist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the Daozang

Schipper, Kristofer, Verellen, Franciscus·2005·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226721064.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acting on Huanglao's guidance, Zhou looked inside and perceived the gods in his cranial Cavern Chamber; this qualified him for the Great Cavern Scripture.

    “Following Huanglao's instructions, Zhou gazed within, and 'as a result, saw them within his [cranial] Cavern Chamber'.「果見洞房之中」, 54 an experience which qualified him to receive the ultimate teaching, the Great Cavern Scripture.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schipper, K., & Verellen, F.
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2005
OpenAlex
W4247314379
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
Daoism, Taoist scriptures, Chinese religious texts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review