Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neolithic cave burials: Agency, structure and environment

Peterson, Rick·2019

Abstract

The book studies Neolithic burial in Britain by focussing primarily on evidence from caves. It interprets human remains from 48 Neolithic caves and compares them to what we know of Neolithic collective burial elsewhere in Britain and Europe. It provides a contextual archaeology of these cave burials, treating them as important evidence for the study of Neolithic mortuary practice generally. It begins with a thoroughly contextualized review of the evidence from the karst regions of Europe. It then goes on to provide an up to date and critical review of the archaeology of Neolithic funerary practice. This review uses the ethnographically documented concept of the ‘intermediary period’ in multi-stage burials to integrate archaeological evidence, cave sedimentology and taphonomy. Neolithic caves, environments and the dead bodies within them would also have been perceived as active subjects with similar kinds of agency to the living. The book demonstrates that cave burial was one of the earliest elements of the British Neolithic. It also shows that Early Neolithic cave burial practice was very varied, with many similarities to other Neolithic burial rites. However, by the Middle Neolithic, cave burial had changed and a funerary practice which was specific to caves had developed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7228/manchester/9781526118868.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [83]83. Beeching, A. (forthcoming) The Neolithic of Southern France. In Marcigny, C., MacFadyen, L. and Roberts, J. (eds) The Prehistory of France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Beeching, A., Berger, J-F., Brochier, J.L., Ferber, F., Helmer, D. and Sidi Maamar, H. 2000. Chasséens: agriculteurs ou éleveurs, sédentaires ou nomads? Quels types de milieu, d'économies et de sociétés? In Leduc, M., Valdeyron, N. and Vaquer, J. (eds) Sociétés et espaces. Actualité de la recherche. Rencontres Méridionales de Préhistoire Récente. Toulouse: Archives d'Ecologie Préhistorique, 59–79. Bennett, W. 1938. Giant's Graves, Pen-y-Ghent. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 34, 318. Beyneix, A. 2012. Le Monde des Morts au Néolithique en Aquitaine: essai de synthèse. L'Anthropologie 116, 222-233. Binder, D. and Maggi, R. 2001. Le Néolithique ancien de l'arc liguro-provençal. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 98/3, 411-422. Binder, D., Bouchier, J-L., Duday, H., Helmer, D., Marinval, P., Thjiebault, S., and Wattez, J.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, R.
Published
2019-06-01
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neolithic cave burials: Agency, structure and environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7228/manchester/9781526118868.001.0001
The paper
Peterson, R. (2019). Neolithic cave burials: Agency, structure and environment. https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526118868.001.0001