The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mathematical Proficiency for All Students: Toward a Strategic Research and Development Program in Mathematics Education
Abstract
While the federal government and the nation's school systems have made strides toward improving mathematics education, the knowledge base supporting these efforts has been weak. In response, the RAND Mathematics Study Panel has proposed an R&D program supporting the improvement of mathematics proficiency among U.S. school students. The panel identified three areas for focused R&D-development of teachers' mathematical knowledge, teaching and learning of skills for mathematical thinking and problem-solving, and teaching and learning of algebra from kindergarten through grade 12.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prospective elementary teachers use of representation to reason algebraically
Richardson, K., Berenson, S., & Staley, K. (2009) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, D. L.
- Corresponding author
- Deborah Loewenberg Ball
- Venue
- RAND Corporation eBooks
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W571823843
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RAND Corporation eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- mathematics education, mathematics proficiency, research and development programs, teacher mathematical knowledge, mathematical thinking, problem solving, algebra instruction, K-12 mathematics, educational research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
