The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The MOS Social Support Survey
Abstract
This paper describes the development and evaluation of a brief, multidimensional, self-administered, social support survey that was developed for patients in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), a two-year survey that was developed for patients with chronic conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey measures emotional/informational support, tangible support, affectionate support, and social interaction.
“Another option is the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey 230 , that measures emotional/informational support, tangible support, affectionate support, and social interaction.”
From The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management (2021) · cites this paper as [230]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stein, D. J., Craske, M. G., Rothbaum, B. O., Chamberlain, S. R., Fineberg, N. A., Choi, K. W., de Jonge, P., Baldwin, D. S., & Maj, M. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20919 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A.
- Venue
- RAND Corporation eBooks
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 1993
- OpenAlex
- W4412573373
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RAND Corporation eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- social support, self-administered surveys, survey development, Medical Outcomes Study, chronic disease, patient-reported outcomes, multidimensional measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
